Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Bookmobile in providing library services; 3) additional information about <br />the relationship between services at the Eugene public library and those <br />at the University of Oregon, Lane Community College, and Northwest <br />Christian College libraries; 4) inclusion of information concerning the <br />function and role of branch libraries and the relationship to a strong <br />central library (found in an appendix to the report); and 5) <br />recommendations concerning the site, including a) to attempt to separate <br />parking from the library site, and b) to strengthen the committee's <br />recommendations about the need to give serious consideration to the <br />possible vacation of Broadway between Lincoln and Charnel ton streets. <br /> <br />Mr. Saul introduced the next three speakers. <br /> <br />Jim Robertson, Robertson/Sherwood Architects, reported that Site 3, at <br />Broadway and Charnel ton, had received the highest score on the matrix <br />that had been used, at 76.5 out of 100 possible points. He said that was <br />15 percent higher than the score received by the existing library site, <br />and he reviewed nine reasons for the Site 3 score: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />1) sufficient size for library and parking; <br />2) location near the downtown commercial and civic center; <br />3) close to downtown employment centers; <br />4) good access by car, bus, bikes, and foot, with Charnel ton and <br />Lincoln streets constructed for higher than current use; <br />5) good potential to enhance adjacent downtown uses; <br />6) more pooling of trips to commercial activity and increased <br />visits to the library; <br />7) public ownership of site; <br />8) minimal impact on existing traffic and parking patterns; <br />9) a multi-story facility would fit with the existing scale of <br />downtown. <br /> <br />Julie Aspinwall-Lamberts, 1286 Piper Lane, of the Library Committee, said <br />she expected parking to be a difficult issue. She said she wanted the <br />council and the public to know that the issue had been difficult for the <br />committee to deal with, but parking would need to be addressed. She said <br />the committee had considered whether to recommend a multi-level parking <br />facility or surface parking, and for the size and spaces needed to serve <br />the library, surface parking would require at least two square city <br />blocks. Ms. Aspinwall-Lamberts said it was a City goal to intensify the <br />density of land use in the downtown area, and surface parking therefore <br />had not seemed a reasonable approach. She added that both the adopted <br />Parking and Circulation Plan and the draft Urban Renewal Plan called for <br />the siting at the Broadway and Charnel ton location of a multi-story <br />parking structure of approximately the same size being recommended in the <br />draft report. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Dick Waters, HPW Associates program consultants, said per capita use <br />showed that the Eugene library was one of the busiest libraries on the <br />West Coast and in the country. Mr. Waters said that in looking at the <br />type of building needed for the future, consultants had looked at the <br />type of future they thought would exist. That future, he said, would <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 25, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />