Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />tional designs would not be allowed. Ms. Wooten was unsure of the distinc- <br />tion between commercial and noncommercial murals in light of the language <br />"decorative.11 Mr. Gleason said the debate about what the regulations will <br />mean is important and one on which the council will spend some time. Mayor <br />Obie observed that he did not think anyone in the community wanted to regu- <br />late murals at all. Mr. Smith said the staff would like to research how <br />other communities have dealt with this issue and what the relevant case law <br />is. Mr. Holmer said that he assumed that a mural representation has as much <br />to do with free speech as the written content of a sign. He had assumed from <br />his reading of the interim code that murals were allowed. Mr. Sercombe said <br />that IImuralll referred to a large representation on the side of a building. <br />Anyone can put a mural within their allowable signage square footage under <br />the code. The issue is, whether outside that area of regulation, the City <br />wishes to allow broad wall paintings in excess of that and, when does that <br />mural become something more than a mural and become a sign. Mr. Sercombe <br />said these are subtle distinctions requiring work. The recommendation is to <br />put this issue aside and work on the issue during the revision, meanwhile <br />allowing for murals under the existing limitations. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten said she would like an expression from the council that it wishes <br />this problem fixed before it adopts a permanent sign code. Mayor Obie said <br />he read the proposal and felt in some areas it was less than perfect. He <br />suggested that staff meet with the sign industry for information and coopera- <br />tion. He felt the cou~cil should hear from these people. Mr. Smith said <br />that staff plans to meet with industry representatives soon. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Wooten, Mr. Smith said the University of <br />Oregon and Lane Regional Arts Council had not been informed of the interim <br />sign code, and he would see that they were informed. <br /> <br />B. Defeat of Lane County Serial Levy <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten noted that the council members had expressed concern in the budget <br />process over the Lane County Library serial levy, soon to appear on the June <br />ballot, and its impact on the City's library. She suggested that the council <br />draft a resolution supporting the serial levy. Mr. Gleason agreed to return <br />with suggestions regarding how support could be best and most effectively <br />expressed by council. <br /> <br />C. Nuclear-Free Zone <br /> <br />Referring to the previous night's vote on the nuclear-free zone, Ms. Wooten <br />asked the council to consider adopting the minimally revised version of the <br />ordinance. She asked that this item be placed on an agenda as soon as possi- <br />ble. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie noted that the community has twice indicated its support for the <br />nuclear-free zone. He said that the only question that remained, and some <br />would say there was no question, was which nuclear-free zone did they want? <br />Mayor Obie suggested that the council hold a public hearing and take a vote. <br />He believed this public hearing and vote should take place within 30 days. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 18, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />