Laserfiche WebLink
<br />- <br /> <br />Mr. Miller asked if it would be more accurate to say that the City's strategy <br />is to assist in marketing. Ms. Wooten pointed out the Hult Center already <br />markets events by itself. She said it would not be accurate to say that the <br />City is going to market with other people. <br /> <br />Ms. Schue thanked the committee and those that worked with it. She said the <br />council should take note of the number of senior citizens who indicated <br />Eugene as a place to retire and give more attention to that issue in the <br />future. <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom said she appreciated the open-mindedness of the committee after <br />the first draft was completed. <br /> <br />Res. No. 4084--A resolution adopting the Economic Development <br />Strategic Plan and repealing Resolution No. <br />3892. <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, to adopt the <br />resolution. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, <br />7:0. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie thanked the committee and community for its work in developing the <br />plan. He turned the meeting over to Council President Holmer. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />II. PUBLIC HEARING: ORDINANCE CONCERNING AN INTERIM SIGN CODE <br /> <br />City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the item. Terry Smith, Department of <br />Public Works, presented the staff report. He said the current Sign Code was <br />adopted in 1968 and modified only slightly since then. He said it was one of <br />the first codes adopted in the country that regulates signs. He said a <br />complete revision of the Sign Code will take six to nine months. Staff feels <br />it is necessary to have an interim sign code to address several legal <br />concerns about the constitutionality of portions of the code. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith said the interim sign code is designed to be content neutral and <br />would allow almost any current sign and future ones to display any type of <br />message. He said the 1968 code is generous with wall signage in that it <br />allows three square feet of sign per lineal foot of building face on, in most <br />cases, all four sides of a building. This contrasts other codes such, as the <br />City of Portland1s, that allows 1.5 square feet of sign per lineal foot only <br />on one wall. If the interim code is left as written, Mr. Smith said it is <br />conceivable that a person can erect a billboard on a building face. He said <br />the problem is that this is not allowed under the current code. <br /> <br />Mr. Smith said staff is proposing three amendments to the interim sign code <br />to help alleviate the contradiction between the two codes. Those amendments <br />are: under 8.620, change the minimum billboard size from 288 to 200 square <br />feet; under 8.630 (a) (1), 8.635 (b) (1), and 8.640 (b) (a), change the <br />maximum allowable sign area from 350 to 200 square feet. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 23, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />