Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />council deadlock on the budget vote. Mr. Gleason said no. Ms. Schue said if <br />people have proposals, the sooner the entire council looks at those proposals <br />the better. Ms. Wooten asked Mr. Rutan if he was working on an alternative <br />budget. Mr. Rutan said that he was working with Councilor Holmer on some <br />recommendations for the council's considerations. He hoped to have those <br />prepared by the following Tuesday at noon. Responding to a question from Ms. <br />Wooten, Mr. Rutan said his recommendations concerned the following year's <br />budget. Ms. Wooten said she would like to have time to review and respond to <br />the comments developed by councilors Rutan and Holmer. She said if the <br />recommendations vary dramatically from the Budget Committee recommendations, <br />there needs to be time for the council to go through the public process and <br />involve the eight lay members of the Budget Committee. Mr. Wong said the <br />legal limit to revise the budget is by ten percent in any fund. <br /> <br />I. ITEMS FROM MAYOR, COUNCIL, AND CITY MANAGER <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan recognized the return of the NCAA Track and Field Championships to <br />Hayward Field the following Wednesday, June 1. He encouraged councilors to <br />attend the meet. He said the event is coming back to Eugene because of the <br />hard work and effort on the part df the Oregon Track Club, the University of <br />Oregon, and Convention and Visitors Bureau, in addition ~o others. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman said there is a memorandum in the council packets regarding the <br />Joint Social Services Fund. She said that there may be a further request for <br />funds to all jurisdictions after the next meeting of the Joint Social Servic- <br />es Committee June 9. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman said she had attended a meeting on the task force working on the <br />Shelton-McMurphey House. There is enthusiasm for the project as it is pro- <br />ceeding. She discussed the issues of handicapped access and historical <br />integrity. Members of the handicapped community had indicated a side en- <br />trance to the house was unacceptable. Some people feared that the creation <br />of a handicapped entrance could affect the historical integrity of the struc- <br />ture. Ms. Ehrman said she would be attending a meeting of the Commission on <br />the Rights of Persons with Disabilities to discuss the problem, share the <br />task force's plans for the house, and bring the commission up to date on the <br />work done so far. She wished to alert the council to the notion that this <br />aspect of the rehabilitation may become a voting issue at some time in the <br />future. <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett said the issue of handicapped access is very important. He felt <br />it had received support in the community. He said that the community needs <br />to find a balanced position as it related to the development of older, his- <br />torical structures. He did not think that that access should devalue the <br />historical nature of the building if access can be achieved in some other <br />fashion. Mr. Bennett said he is still waiting to hear from the staff regard- <br />ing what flexibility exists in the code in terms of making a choice about <br />access and other issues outside fire and life safety. Mr. Gleason said the <br />statutes provide an appeal process, including a hearings official to make a <br />determination about how the code affects the usability of the building. Mr. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 25, 1988 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />