Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e In response to questions, Mr. Mounts said the forecasts for the sewer fund <br /> were based on projects listed in the CIP; this does not necessarily mean, <br /> however, that the sewer fund is the only potential source for these capital <br /> projects. He said the forecasts were simply meant to illustrate what the <br /> financial impact would be if the CIP projects were funded through the sewer <br /> fund. <br /> Ms. Schue asked how larger sewer projects have been funded in the past. <br /> Christine Andersen, Public Works Director, said serial levies and general <br /> obligation bonds have been used. Recently, a number of financing sources <br /> have been used, including some Federal funds. <br /> Ms. Andersen said the forecasts indicate that the maintenance and operating <br /> systems currently in place are going well; significant improvements have been <br /> made in these areas over the past years. On the capital side, however, <br /> policy decisions will have to be made about how to meet major funding needs. <br /> Ms. Ehrman asked what plans were made for major capital projects ten years <br /> ago or so. City Manager Mike Gleason said this issue was not really <br /> addressed in a comprehensive way. <br /> Mr. Bennett asked about the increase in users and sewer fee revenues that <br /> would occur if investments were made in the sewer system, and whether the <br /> increased revenue would meet the cost of the investments. Mr. Gleason said <br /> the second financial forecast indicates that the current rate system would <br /> not generate enough revenue to fund major capital investments in the sewer <br />- system. <br /> Mr. Miller asked about the impact of River Road/Santa Clara annexations on <br /> the sewer fund. Ms. Andersen said that if the annexations occurred less <br /> incrementally, the sewer improvements could be planned and made more <br /> cost-effectively. Mr. Gleason added that the operational costs of the sewer <br /> system would be spread out over more users. <br /> In response to a question from Mayor Obie, Ms. Andersen said Springfield <br /> provides administrative services to the regional sewer system (MWMC), and <br /> Eugene provides the operational services. Mr. Jessie said the total <br /> administrative cost for MWMC is $450,000. He said this represents a decrease <br /> due to a staff reduction plan. He said a performance audit recommended that <br /> between 1 and 1.5 FTE remain as administrative liaisons for MWMC. Mr. Jessie <br /> added that this gives Springfield a partnership role in the regional sewer <br /> system. <br /> Mr. Bennett said the audit gave good marks to the administrative side of <br /> MWMC. He said the political reality is that Springfield wants to playa role <br /> in the regional system. Mayor Obie asked if the administrative contract was <br /> just a buy-off meant to insure Springfield's cooperation in the regional <br /> system. Mr. Bennett did not think so. He believed that Springfield makes a <br /> strong effort to be administratively efficient. <br />. MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 11, 1988 Page 3 <br />