Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e B. Project Report on Housing for the Homeless <br /> County Administrator Jim Johnson thanked the City for its cooperation and <br /> assistance in completing the homeless shelter. Because Springfield decided <br /> to contribute to the project, Eugene's share to this date has amounted to <br /> $49,000. Mr. Gleason said the City Council authorized an expenditure of up <br /> to $70,000 on the homeless shelter. He encouraged the council not to retract <br /> the rest of its funding until the full costs of the shelter are known. <br /> Mr. Johnson said the amount of volunteer and professional labor that went <br /> into the project was phenomenal and expressed appreciation for the <br /> community's favorable response to the shelter. Ms. Wooten agreed. She <br /> suggested that the County and City consider a continuation of funding for the <br /> project beyond April because there will be a continuing need for the shelter. <br /> Mr. Cornacchia said there is currently an effort underway to analyze how <br /> money in the Joint Social Services Fund has been utilized. One option is to <br /> fold the Human Services Planning Project over the Joint Social Services Fund, <br /> and have the fund acknowledge the needs of the community rather than <br /> continually funding agencies which are currently funded. Ms. Wooten agreed <br /> but felt the jurisdictions would have difficulty agreeing on new funding <br /> priorities. <br /> Ms. Schue felt Springfield's eager and generous contribution to the shelter <br /> was gratifying. Mr. Cornacchia agreed, saying that this was a hard decision <br /> for Springfield to make. He said the City of Springfield has an ongoing <br /> debate about allocating money for agencies and programs located in Eugene; <br /> e this feeling had to be overcome before they agreed to donate to the shelter. <br /> Ms. Ehrman felt the Joint Social Services Committee has been sensitive to <br /> this feeling. In the past, the committee has gone out of its way to fund <br /> agencies located in Springfield and elsewhere in the county. <br /> C. Proposal for Youth Development Consortium <br /> Commissioner Ball said that two years ago Commissioner Rogers asked for a <br /> review of the County's youth services in anticipation of passage of Senate <br /> Bill 780 giving the County direct policy authority for juvenile services <br /> (starting in early 1988). During the middle of the review process, Governor <br /> Goldschmidt decided that children's issues would be a high statewide <br /> priority. As these two efforts came together, many youth service providers <br /> throughout the county urged the consolidation of the County's youth services <br /> and planning functions. Mr. Ball said this request has been given serious <br /> consideration and Lane County's Children's Task Force (CTF) is recommending <br /> that the Juvenile Services Commission, Student Retention Initiative, and <br /> allocations to other youth service agencies be merged into a Youth <br /> Development Consortium. <br /> Mr. Ball said the governor has indicated that the County will be the primary <br /> focus for the new children's agenda and that significant revenues allocated <br /> for children's issues will be allocated through the County. The new <br /> consortium will be the allocating body for these funds as well as the <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 30, 1988 Page 3 <br />