My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/19/1988 Meeting
COE
>
City of Eugene
>
Council Minutes
>
Historic Minutes
>
1988
>
12/19/1988 Meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2007 9:09:56 PM
Creation date
11/2/2006 4:31:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council Minutes
Meeting_Type
Meeting
CMO_Meeting_Date
12/19/1988
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> e video rentals, and tickets) would provide insufficient revenue ($200,000) and <br /> would have high administrative costs. Mayor Obie explained that the <br /> committee sought to avoid suggesting property taxes as a revenue source. <br /> Answering Mr. Holmer's inquiry about dedicating increased revenues from <br /> EWES's rate increase, Mayor Obie said that increase had already been included <br /> in budget projections. Finance Director Warren Wong added that increases in <br /> all franchise fees had been factored into balancing the General Fund budget <br /> in the Six- Year Financial Forecast. He went on to say that the projections <br /> included three percent per year compounded for six years (normal growth <br /> related to increases in population) and a six to ten percent rate increase. <br /> Mr. Gleason estimated the difference as amounting to $100,000 to $150,000. <br /> Tony Mounts, Finance Division staff, said that a four percent overall growth <br /> rate was anticipated. That included one percent in increased consumption and <br /> three percent for inflation. Mr. Wong reported that the difference between <br /> the projections in the forecast and those of EWES was $182,000 in FY89, <br /> $171,000 in FY90, and $265,000 in FY91. He said the current year's $182,000 <br /> was being applied against the projected General Fund deficit. <br /> Mr. Miller asked whether the use of computer technology provided an <br /> opportunity for cost savings by reducing the labor intensity of certain <br /> library functions. Ms. Hildebrand replied that labor savings from automation <br /> have already been realized and how to cut supply costs was being explored. <br /> Responding to Mr. Miller's question about user fees for special staff <br /> e assistance, Ms. Hildebrand said some services are already charged (overdue <br /> fines and reserves). Records and tapes are approximately three percent of <br /> the collection and charging for their use would probably not net significant <br /> revenue. While some services could be developed and marketed, she said staff <br /> hopes to avoid check-out charges. Ms. Hildebrand emphasized that a recent <br /> national survey found no public library that charges for a user card. <br /> Mr. Holmer anticipated public testimony regarding the accessibility of the <br /> 8th and Olive site and asked if lack of accessibility may reduce the need for <br /> additional staff. Ms. Hildebrand said increased use could be expected <br /> regardless of the library's location, but she suggested that staffing could <br /> be phased. <br /> Councilors discussed the difficulty of predicting how rapidly expanded use <br /> could be expected. <br /> Mayor Obie suggested that the council may need to consider re-ordering its <br /> priorities and including the library in the General Fund. Mr. Gleason <br /> pointed out that the council always has the option to change its priorities <br /> and he reminded councilors that $250,000 had been taken from the contingency <br /> fund as a result of the failure of the County Library levy. In the absence <br /> of a new levy, that $250,000 will have to become internal to the operating <br /> account next year. Recognizing that the council already faces a $1 million <br /> shortfall in addition to an unexpected $300,000 increased labor bill, Mr. <br /> Gleason described the additional $600,000 as a challenge. <br /> e MINUTES--City Council December 19, 1988 Page 2 <br /> Work Session <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.