Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e Responding to a question from Ms. Ehrman, Ms. Miller explained that the <br />County issues permits based on whether a medical hardship exists and a family <br />member is involved, and does not have many of the standards being proposed in <br />the ordinance. The County has no conditions for siting nor any conditions <br />for removal. <br /> <br />Ms. Schue asked about the number of residential lots in Eugene that would <br />meet the requirements outlined in the ordinance. Ms. Hahn replied that a map <br />plotted by the Lane Council of Governments indicates that a large number of <br />parcels in the city exceed the square footage requirement. <br /> <br />Answering an inquiry from Mr. Holmer, Ms. Hahn said that the mlnlmum <br />residential lot size is 4,500 square feet. Currently, mobile homes can only <br />locate in mobile home parks and subdivisions. Ms. Hahn clarified that the <br />ordinance will not affect modular homes. <br /> <br />Mayor Miller opened the public hearing. <br /> <br />Lauri Thomas, 830 Larch Street, spoke in favor of the ordinance. Describing <br />her personal situation, which involves a grandmother unable to maintain her <br />own residence and unable to afford other care arrangements, Ms. Thomas <br />maintained that th~ ordinance would move the community in the direction of <br />caring for its members who are elderly, or who have suffered a head injury or <br />major illness and are attempting to re-enter an independent living situation. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />There being no additional requests to speak, Mayor Miller closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Green asked about monitoring the hardship to determine the ongoing need <br />for the mobile home permit. Ms. Hahn responded that the permit will be valid <br />for two years. She anticipated that the City would develop a tracking system <br />for existing permits and would notify permit-holders of the need to resubmit <br />their applications or lose the permit after two years. She said it would be <br />possible to reduce the permit period to less than two years. <br /> <br />While he commended the desire to care for family members, Mr. Bennett <br />wondered if the requirement that a lot be at least 8,000 square feet would <br />have the effect of encouraging larger lots and defeat the commitment to <br />compact urban growth. Mr. Bennett considered the concept of off-site open <br />space important in issues surrounding multi-family site development and he <br />expressed concern that mobile homes in back yards could disrupt homogenous <br />neighborhood plans and adversely affect property values. Mr. Bennett also <br />questioned how a two-year permit period with the option of renewal could be <br />considered a temporary situation. <br /> <br />Responding to Ms. Ehrman's questions about enforcement measures, Ms. Miller <br />explained that the Municipal Court system would be used for this type of <br />contract violation. She pointed out that enforcement activity would focus <br />more on achieving compliance than on collecting a fine. Referring to <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />February 27, 1989 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />