Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan agreed with Ms. Schue on the importance of briefing all councilors <br />on annexation issues and reviewing the City's current annexation policies. <br />He did not feel the council could hold effective discussions of this nature, <br />however, while the State Legislature is in session. <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer suggested that the council's discussions on annexation involve <br />participants from outside the City so that the council can explore a variety <br />of perspectives on annexation. He mentioned Mr. Cornacchia as one example. <br /> <br />C. Role of the Downtown Commission <br /> <br />Mr. Holmer said that at a recent meeting of the Downtown Commission, members <br />expressed concern about their role in City government. In particular, the <br />commission was concerned about the way the City engages in development <br />projects. When the council became the urban renewal agency for the city, the <br />role of the Downtown Commission was created. Mr. Holmer said the commission <br />feels it is removed from the decision-making process, in which they have a <br />large investment. One illustration of this is that the proposed St. Laurent <br />and Pankow projects would utilize a substantial portion of funds, not all of <br />which are tax increment funds. The Downtown Commission feels this depletes <br />the resources available to address issues in the downtown area. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Ms. Bascom said the Cultural Affairs Commission has requested a joint meeting <br />with the council and asked if councilors had any objections. Ms. Schue and <br />Mr. Holmer both felt the council should discuss the role of the Cultural <br />Affairs Commission as well' as that of the Downtown Commission. <br /> <br />D. Trends in Local Job Creation <br /> <br />Mr. Bennett said that in the past, the council has had significant <br />discussions about the types of new jobs being created and what kind of <br />industry the council should be trying to facilitate. With this in mind, he <br />read the following statement for the record (from the May/June 1989 issue of <br />NETMA newsletter, produced by the City's Business Assistance Team): "Most of <br />the new jobs created in Oregon since 1982 have been higher-paying jobs in <br />professional/technical occupations. New jobs have actually helped raised <br />earned income levels in the state. The notion that most new jobs are being <br />created in low-paying service work is a "myth." All kinds of occupations are <br />found in service industries including a considerable number of <br />professional/technical occupations like computer programmers and accountants. <br />While there has been some loss of earning power when comparing 1979 earnings <br />to 1987 inflation-adjusted earnings, new jobs are not to blame. In fact, <br />they have helped raise earned income levels. It is the quality of the "work <br />force," not the quality of "new jobs," that present obstacles to the Oregon <br />comeback. As employers find a need to cut labor costs and at the same time <br />increase productivity, more skilled workers are needed. The skill shift <br />towards professional/technical occupations is dramatic. From 1979 to 1986, <br />over 57,000 new professional and technical jobs were created. Sales jobs <br />have also exploded, but most of this increase is in higher-skill positions <br />requiring marketing know-how and offering higher wages and commissions. <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 17, 1989 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />