Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> --- <br />e There being no additional requests to speak, Councilor Bascom closed the <br /> public hearing. <br /> Answering questions from Mr. Holmer, Mr. Schutz anticipated that the <br /> increased fee would provide approximately $60,000 in FY90 and $120,000 in <br /> future years, depending on activity. The Capital Improvement Program may <br /> provide funds for the repair of the Hult Center's roof (in about ten years), <br /> while other items on a list of needs are considered "1uxuryll items and could <br /> await available funding. <br /> Mr. Green expressed concern about the basis for costs listed in the capital <br /> outlay projection and said a comparison cost sheet would have been helpful. <br /> Mr. Schutz explained that figures were derived by the Hult Center's operation <br /> director'and assume an inflationary factor. Mr. Gleason said a comparison <br /> sheet would be made available and he reminded councilors that individual <br /> items will be brought up as part of the discussion on the budget prior to <br /> authorization. <br /> Responding to an inquiry from Mr. Boles, Mr. Schutz said that it is hoped <br /> that the fee will make General Fund allocation to capital needs unnecessary, <br /> but he noted that emergency needs are difficult to anticipate. Mr. Gleason <br /> added that while the user fee is an attempt to develop a strategy that will <br /> provide an ongoing source of operating and capital funds, no suggestion is <br /> being made that there will never be a proposal for capital improvement in the <br /> General Fund budget. <br />e Mr. Boles continued by asking why the language suggested by the Cultural <br /> Affairs Commission that specifically earmarks this revenue for capital <br /> refurbishment was not included in the ordinance. Mr. Gleason responded that <br /> the council's adopted financial policies leave discretion to the Budget <br /> Committee and the City Council as to the distribution of funds in order to <br /> avoid frequent adjustment of ordinances during the budgeting process. <br /> Mr. Holmer added that he would vote against the ordinance if the language <br /> referred to by Mr. Boles were included because he objected to allocating fee <br /> revenues for future unspecified expenses. He considered the budget process <br /> the appropriate avenue for determining specific funding needs. <br /> CB 417S--An ordinance to increase the Patron User Fee from <br /> $.50 to $1; to impose the Patron User Fee at events <br /> held at Cuthbert Amphitheatre; to make these changes <br /> effective for events occurring after December 31, <br /> 1989, except those contracted prior to November 1, <br /> 1989. <br /> Mr. Bennett moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, that the bill, with <br /> unanimous consent of the council, be read the second time by <br /> council bill number only, and that enactment be considered at <br /> this time. Roll call vote; the motion carried unanimously, <br /> 7:0. <br />e MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 6, 1989 Page 3 <br />