Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Exhibit A to Eugene Ordinance No. 20413 <br /> <br />FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW <br /> <br />GENERAL FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br /> <br />Delta Sand and Gravel Company is requesting approval of Eugene-Springfield Metropolitan <br />Comprehensive Plan (Metro Plan) amendments to add 72.31 acres of its property to the Goal 5 <br />Significant Aggregate Site Inventory of the Metro Plan and to re-designate that land from <br />Agriculture to Sand and Gravel. In addition to these Metro Plan amendments, Lane County is <br />also considering the applicant's related request to rezone the subject property from Exclusive <br />Farm Use to Sand, Gravel and Rock Products. The subject property contains 72.31 acres and is <br />located adjacent to the existing Delta mining and processing facility. The property is adjacent to, <br />but outside of, the Eugene-Springfield Urban Growth Boundary and is located within the Metro <br />Plan boundary. The proposed plan amendments and rezone will allow Delta Sand and Gravel <br />Company to expand its aggregate mining site onto its adjacent property (the proposed expansion <br />area that is the subject of this request). <br /> <br />METRO PLAN AMENDMENT <br /> <br />OAR 660-023-0180 is the Oregon Statewide Planning Goal 5 Rule regarding aggregate <br />resources. OAR 660-023-0180(9) provides that if local governments have not amended their <br />comprehensive plans and land use regulations to include procedures and requirements consistent <br />with the Goal 5 Rule for the consideration of post-acknowledgement plan amendments (PAPAs) <br />regarding aggregate resources, the procedures and requirements of the Goal 5 Rule shall be <br />directly applicable to a local government consideration of a PAPA. Therefore, Metro Plan, Lane <br />Code and Eugene Code land use regulations related to PAPAs regarding aggregate resources are <br />not applicable to this application. The Land Use Board of Appeals decision in Morse Bros. v. <br />Columbia County, 37 Or LUBA 85 (1999) supports the conclusion that OAR 660-023-0180(9) <br />preempts the application of local comprehensive plan amendment to such PAPAs until the local <br />comprehensive plan and land use regulations have been amended to comply with the Goal 5 <br />Rule. <br /> <br />The Metro Plan has not been amended to adopt procedures and requirements consistent with the <br />Goal 5 Rule for the consideration of such PAPAs. The Lane Code and the Eugene Code do not <br />contain specific criteria regarding the consideration of a PAPA proposing to add a site to the <br />Metro Plan's acknowledged list of significant aggregate sites and have not been amended to <br />conform to the requirements of the Goal 5 Rule through periodic review. Therefore, only the <br />provisions of the Goal 5 Rule shall be directly applicable to Eugene and Lane County's <br />consideration of this application. <br /> <br />METRO PLAN AMENDMENT CRITERIA AND FINDINGS <br /> <br />The subject property is within the Metro Plan boundary and outside of the Eugene-Springfield <br />Urban Growth Boundary. The application requests an amendment to the Metro Plan diagram <br />which is a Type II Metro Plan amendment. The application constitutes a citizen-initiated Type II <br />Metro Plan amendment. <br /> <br />Eugene Code 9.7730(3) - Approval Criteria <br /> <br />(3) Criteria for Approval of Plan Amendment. The following <br />criteria shall be applied by the city council in approving or <br />denying a Metro Plan amendment application: <br /> <br />Exhibit A to Ordinance 20413 - 1 <br />