Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />~l <br /> <br />Dr. Bert Hoeflich, 750 East 11th, Lane County Medical Society, said that the <br />area is residentially mixed use. It is expensive land that the medical community <br />has developed with a pleasant planning code. He urged councilors to drive in <br />the area. He said there is not much land for future medical development. The <br />Planning Commission plan is acceptable. <br /> <br />Dr. Samuel Graves, 735 Nadine Avenue, stated that he represents Serenity Lane (a <br />clinic south of 13th). He said the clinic has had community support. It has <br />treated 1,900 patients and touched 7,500 lives. The original draft made Serenity <br />Lane a non-conforming use with no expansion allowed. The Planning Commission <br />offered a fair hearing on this issue. It is a good recommendation. <br /> <br />Jim Saul, PO Box 1650, Eugene, said he had worked with the Chamber Subcommittee <br />in preparing testimony. He said the council should consider this plan in <br />relation to other City refinement plans, which include business/ commercial <br />elements (Whiteaker or Bethel/Danebo). Those economic issues were not addressed <br />, in the original draft, therefore it was the obligation of the Planning Commis- <br />sion to incorporate those elements. He said questions have been raised about <br />housing in the area. From 1960-1980, housing increased by 1,769 units; in <br />contrast, clinic use represents 5.5 acres of residentially-zoned land, or <br />6-percent of the residential land area. Mr. Saul reviewed the recommendation as <br />explained by Ms. Miller and Mr. Thwing. He recognized that it was the preroga- <br />tive of the council to change the document, but he urged that careful considera- <br />tion, time, and study be given before significant changes are made, and that <br />public hearings be part of the process of change. They believe that the recom- <br />mendations were appropriate. <br /> <br />Dick Case, 616 East 16th Avenue, Eugene, Board of Directors of Serenity Lane, <br />said the clinic has been in its location ten years. He is a volunteer and noted <br />the good works that the clinic does in helping people deal with alcholism. <br />It is estimated there are 16,000 alcholics in Lane County in need of help. <br />Expansion has been considered for seven years. Appearance of the structure <br />would be a top consideration. Serenity Lane supports the changes made by the <br />Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Edward Duke, 3412 Breezewood, Eugene, Executive Secretary of the Lane County <br />Medical Society, said the Medical Society had not been consulted before in <br />developing the plan draft and welcomed the opportunity to appear before the <br />Planning Commission. They support the recommendations as a reasonable compromise. <br /> <br />Jeff Reingold, 1065 High Street, Eugene, manager and owner of property in the <br />neighborhood, said concerns had been addressed and the document was a reasonable <br />compromise. His major concern is housing. The plan has three elements to <br />increase the housing stock in the area: 1) No new clinics south of 13th. <br />2) Reduction of parking requirements. 3) Allow residential uses in commercial <br />zones. <br /> <br />Testifying against the the Planning Commission recommendation: <br /> <br />Sarah Mahler, 1588 Patterson, chair of the Refinement Planning Team that developed <br />the orlglnal plan, and a member of the neighborhood that is not in support of <br />the Planning Commission's recommended plan, speaking for the neighborhood, said <br />that they were caught between planning fads. The goals of the City had changed <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 25, 1982 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />