03/08/1982 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

e Page 7 of the ordinance, Mr. Martin said, deals primarily with the adjustment in programming that results in the January 1, 1983, deadline for conversion of the program as outlined in the cover memorandum to the council. Some of the signals that are now part of the basic service will be moved up to the next tier. People can buy a converter from Teleprompter at cost and pay an installation fee set by the commission or buy a converter from a private outlet. What is part of the basic program and what requires a converter will always be an item open to discussion. e The access facility, its equipment, and Teleprompter's obligation are outlined on page 9 of the ordinance. Teleprompter must provide the studio and make available to the commission $140,000 within 30 days of the execution of the agreement, and the commission will use the money to determine what equipment is to go into the access center. The commission, not Teleprompter, will choose what equipment is needed. An additional $60,000 will be made available during the second year of the agreement. Teleprompter will provide one full-time technician to maintain equipment in the center and has agreed to provide $50,000 per year for the operation of the access center. The Cable Commission and Teleprompter will meet no later than September 30, 1983, to examine what is happening to the financing of the access center and whether independent sources of revenue have been developed for the access operation. Responsibility for the success of the center has been given to the Cable Commmission with Teleprompter providing some financial support. Ms. Wooten asked how the negotiated budget for the access center compared with other agreements Teleprompter has executed in other cities. Mr. Martin said it varied widely. New franchises give more but want a twenty-year agreement. The agreement negotiated by the Cable Commission is reviewed every three years for possible changes. Mr. Martin urged the council to keep in mind that Tele- prompter's capital investment is in a system that can't automatically jump to a system of increased channels because it would require very expensive changes. In negotiating a budget for the access center, Mr. Martin said that the commis- sion was aware that costs provided by Teleprompter would get passed on to individual subscribers. Ms. Wooten also asked about remodeling costs for a studio. Mr. Martin said what constitutes providing and maintaining a studio was still to be discussed. What costs the $50,000 will go toward has not been decided by the commission. Other questions yet to be resolved include whether there will be charges for using the center, what the priorities will be, and what the regulations will be. A 2l-member committee established by the commission is working on those questions. Mr. Martin noted that the fourth channel for public access has been defined more clearly in the proposed ordinance. In continuing his review, Mr. Martin said that rates must be filed with the commission. There was considerable debate by the commission about what was meant by reasonable standards in the indudstry. He said the commission felt reasonable standards related to comparable systems. In resolving the legal implications of using the word "reasonable," the City Attorney's Office has clarified in the language of the ordinance what the expectations are in terms e MINUTES--Eugene City Council Work Session March 8, 1982 Page 3