Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Councilor Schue requested staff comment on density requirements. Mr. Sloat said <br /> the document states that the neighborhood goal is to attain four units per acre <br /> e as an overall density. Neighborhood goals are not adopted as city policy. The <br /> Metropolitan Area General Plan policy of one unit per acre is the policy that is <br /> stated in this plan. The neighborhood goal and desire by the planning team and <br /> neighborhood association was to have a neighborhood goal of four units per acre. <br /> That goal is based on their feeling for the special character of the area as <br /> well as slope, vegetation, drainage, and topographic issues taken into consider- <br /> ation by the South Hills Study. The South Hills Study would limit almost all <br /> the development in the plan area to five units per acre. In reality, the <br /> maximum density will be short of five units per acre. The neighborhood goal is <br /> intended to recognize the development constraints and the character of the area, <br /> and recognize the necessity to make the plan ~onsistent with the Metro Plan. <br /> The statement recognizing one to ten units per acre is a policy statement <br /> which would be adopted as City policy. <br /> Councilor Miller commented that this plan is different from most plans consid- <br /> ered. One of those important points is the difference between neighborhood <br /> goals and policies. There are a number of statements that are statements of <br /> what the neighborhood and Planning Commission want to have happen that do not <br /> necessarily fit in with City goals of lower density. There are some other <br /> constraints on the density of the area. One of those is the unusual layout <br /> of the lots that have been platted, many of which are 66 or 76 feet wide and <br /> 300 or 400 feet long. The density will be low unless someone buys a number of <br /> lots and replats them. The actual redevelopment potential is lower than it <br /> appears. That as well as the slope constraints in the undeveloped part of the <br /> valley, tend to make lower density more realistic than it might look like <br /> otherwise. Land prices will have to increase considerably to make it worth <br /> e someone's while to replat lots. The Metro Plan is still the controlling City <br /> policy for the area. As the City Council discussed the Metro Plan, this was one <br /> of the areas where it was clear there would be disagreement between the overall <br /> public good of increasing urban density, and the wishes of the people in the <br /> immediate area not to significantly change the density. The City can work with <br /> this as a planning system because the City can anticipate that capital improve- <br /> ments and public improvements will be planned for an overall density of five <br /> units to the acre. Some developers will develop intensely and some people will <br /> continue to live on 1-1/2 acres. <br /> Res. No. 3700--A resolution adopting the Laurel Hill Refinement <br /> Plan Update. <br /> Ms. Schue moved, seconded by Ms. Smith, to adopt the resolution. <br /> Roll call vote; motion carried unanimously. <br /> Councilor Miller thanked those volunteers who worked on the plan. Councilor <br /> Hamel said those who spent much time should not feel it is the end, but the <br /> beginning. Input will need to be given to staff and councilors of the area. <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 26, 1982 <br /> Page 3 <br />