Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />services or commodities with the funds. Ms. Wooten felt that since Mr. Hartnett's <br />presentation to the council had been made in July 1982, material regarding the <br />bureau's work plan should have been re-distributed to councilors in anticipation <br />of tonight's hearing. <br /> <br />Councilor Lindberg asked what the room tax rates were in market areas with <br />which Eugene was competing. Mr. Lonstrom said that rates in Portland, Eugene's <br />primary competitor, are six percent and that Portland's total budget for tourist <br />and convention promotion is nearly $900,000. Mr. Lindberg asked if the sales <br />tax proposals being considered in the State Legislature included taxing hotels <br />and motels. Dale Munkres, Valley River Inn, said that in other states the room <br />tax is separate from the sales tax, and the sales tax is not applied to rooms. <br />He said that the Oregon bills were atypical in proposing that both taxes be <br />applied. <br /> <br />Councilor Wooten said she had served on the Room Tax Committee since 1981. She <br />said she supported the one-percent increase but had serious reservations regarding <br />the allocation of the funds. She said that while she appreciated the work of the <br />Convention and Visitors' Bureau, she felt the City also had obligations to other <br />destination-point activities, such as the Hu1t Center and local performing arts <br />groups. <br /> <br />Councilor Smith said that at its March 9, 1983, meeting the Room Tax Committee <br />had reached consensus that allocating the additional one percent to the Con- <br />vention and Visitors' Bureau would generate more revenue for performing arts <br />groups and had therefore supported the ordinance and resolution. <br /> <br />Councilor Lindberg noted that at a work session prior to tonight's meeting the <br />council discussed comprehensive financial planning for the arts. He felt <br />that if the additional one percent were divided among a number of groups, it <br />would not have as much impact as providing the full amount to the bureau to use <br />in promotional efforts that would in turn generate more Room Tax revenues. <br />Councilor Schue concurred with Mr. Lindberg. <br /> <br />Councilor Wooten urged that the allocation of the additional one percent be <br />reviewed annually. <br /> <br />Mayor Keller asked council support for the increase proposal. He concurred with <br />Ms. Wooten's suggestion of an annual review of the allocation. <br /> <br />Councilor Smith said that the ordinance as written calls for review to be done <br />by the Room Tax Committee. She felt that this was the appropriate body to <br />conduct the review and then to make a report to the City Council. <br /> <br />Councilor Ball supported the increase but suggested that the City wait until the <br />County takes action before deciding on the allocation. He felt that an increase <br />larger than one percent should be considered. Mayor Keller responded that the <br />industry had agreed to support the one-percent increase and that he felt it <br />would not be advisable to change that amount at this time. Councilor Smith <br />concurred with Mayor Keller's remarks. <br /> <br />Councilor Wooten referred to the deficit in the Hu1t Center budget and noted <br />that some of the funds from the one-percent increase could be used to offset the <br />need for using General Funds or other City funds to cover that deficit. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />March 14, 1983 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />