Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Councilor Hansen, Mayor Keller said that he had <br />discussed his proposal with the Chairperson of the Performing Arts Commission, <br />who felt that the group would be most willing to take on this task. <br /> <br />After further debate, councilors agreed to discuss the Hu1t Center budget <br />problem at a Wednesday council meeting following completion of the work of the <br />Budget Committee on May 19. It was agreed that, based on this discussion, the <br />council would develop policy recommendations on the matter. <br /> <br />II. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br />A. Parks and Recreation Master Plan (memo, resolution, background informa- <br />tion distributed) <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason introduced Ernie Drapela, Director of the Parks and Recreation <br />Department. Mr. Drape1a said that the plan under which the Parks Department was <br />currently operating had been in place for the past 30 years. He said that work <br />on the Master Plan being considered by the council tonight had begun in 1981 and <br />was funded at a total of $65,000. He noted that if this plan served the City <br />for 20 years, it would have cost $3,250 per year. Mr. Drape1a referred to the <br />memorandum of March 8, 1983, which had been distributed to councilors and which <br />gave a chronology of the plan development process since March 1981. He said <br />that the following data sources had been used in compiling the plan: 1) tra- <br />ditional and historic patterns; 2) phone and personal surveys of expressed <br />desires, including 562 phone surveys with citizens, over 50 face-to-face inter- <br />views with service providers, seven community-wide meetings, presentations to 14 <br />of the City's 20 neighborhood groups, and written and spoken testimony received; <br />3) current practices in other communities; and 4) professional expertise regard- <br />ing state-of-the-art parks and recreation systems. Mr. Drapela said that the <br />resulting plan represented the best collective thinking of the entire community. <br />He noted that the Joint Parks Committee would review the plan annually. <br />Mr. Drapela said that although there was currently little funding to implement <br />much of the plan, the plan would be ready to serve the City when funding becomes <br />available. He noted that two copies of the resolution had been distributed and <br />recommended that the amended resolution, which deleted the original Section 7 . <br />regarding plan amendment procedures, be adopted. Mr. Drapela said that the <br />deletion was recommended since Policy 8, Chapter 4, of the Metropolitan Area <br />General Plan made inclusion of the material in the original Section 7 unnecessary. <br /> <br />Mr. Drapela introduced John Etter, Superintendent of Parks Planning and Design, <br />to discuss the technical aspects of the plan. Mr. Etter said that the Joint <br />Parks Committee had worked with community representatives to address the follow- <br />ing areas/sources of specific concern: Audubon Society, West Butte area, <br />Jefferson Pool, senior citizen needs, Golden Gardens, Downtown Commission <br />recommendations, School District 4-J concerns, and concerns with emphasis on <br />acquisition versus development of parkland. Mr. Etter used a series of overlays <br />to show the acquistions and developments of parkland called for in the Master <br />Plan. He thanked the Planning Department staff and the consulting firm of EDAW <br />for their work on the plan. He noted that there was an error in the published <br />plan and that the correct figure in Section 5.8 was 330 acres of land of City- <br />wide significance. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 9, 1983 <br /> <br />Page 3 <br />