07/11/1983 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

charter provision requires a public vote on freeways and throughways (con- trolled limited access). Messrs. Gleason and Shelton then explained that e because the Chambers construction did not qualify as a "limited access roadbed" or freeway, no vote would be necessary according to the law. In addition, access will be available in that access rights from abutting properties will not be purchased. Mr. Shelton continued by describing the two alternative routes for the four-lane, two-way, at-grade 6 and 7th extension to the East. The Citizen's Advisory Committee recommended two routes for further analysis . The draft EIS will address these two alternatives by impacts on businesses and residents in the area. After the public meetings, the Planning Commission and Council will have to prepare a ballot measure for March, May, or June. He noted that the construction funding had not been programmed, and therefore obtaining the funding would be a major objective in the City's presentation to the Oregon Transportation Commission. Mr. Shelton then described the 6th and 7th Avenue widening from High to Garfield that would involve a four-lane, one-way street with a corridor of trees. While the ODOT would plant 130 trees in the first phase, some older existing trees will have to be removed in the process. He handed out sketches of the proposed widening illustrating the finished version. Concern was expressed on the removal of existing trees, and members felt that the input and support of affected property owners was important for this phase. Extensive discussion took place on implications of a public vote. There was a suggestion for a new freeway amendment to the charter on the November ballot e to simplify the approval process and enable the City to acquire the State funds. However, several councilors agreed on the necessity to make the existing process work as a step in citizen review. Some councilors stated because the original amendment was outdated and created an encumbrance to improvements vital for economic development, a new amendment should be considered. There was concern on the timing of the amendment change as a public debate could create questions by the citizenry on why this move was being considered at this time with the potential of a "backlash effectll and resultant loss of State funding. Mr. Keller suggested that there be further discussion on this issue in view of the range of opinions before a decision was made on Council action. II. COUNCIL GOAL SESSION Several dates were explored for the goal session to be facilitated by Don Murray. The dates of Friday, October 28, and Saturday, October 29, were selected. The sessions will commence on the afternoon or early evening of October 28 with staff presentations, and continue into Friday evening and through the following day. III. WEDNESDAY MEETING FORMAT Mr. Obie suggested eliminating Wednesday noon meetings when there were too few agenda items to warrant a meeting. It was suggested these be added to the agendas of other Council meetings. e MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 11, 1983 Page 3