Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e Warren Wong, City Finance Director, reported on the financial aspects of clinic <br /> operations. The clinic is part of the Finance Division, within the Admini- <br /> strative Services Department, and is budgeted from the General Fund. The <br /> Finance Department has tried to set clinic fees at a rate that would cover <br /> direct costs of the clinic. The direct costs include salaries, supplies, <br /> equipment, and rent. Indirect costs for administrative overhead expenses, <br /> ranging from $1,000 to $2,500, are not charged to the clinic. While the <br /> clinic operated at a loss last year, this year's budget is projected to balance. <br /> Dr. Penfold, a Eugene veterinarian in private practice, highlighted contents and <br /> issues as contained in an informational packet that had been prepared on behalf <br /> of the Lane County Veterinary Medical Association and distributed to councilors. <br /> He explained that his presentation was in response to Councilor Obie's suggestion <br /> at a budget meeting in May, 1983, for additional background. In a comparison of <br /> "yellow page" listings from 1978 and 1982, he maintained that there had been no <br /> significant change in the number of veterinarians in the area in rebuttal to <br /> Councilor Lindberg's prior statement about significant growth of veterinarians <br /> in the area. He marked sections of the "yellow pages" to illustrate the amount <br /> of closure of veterinary practices and hospitals, and referred to several <br /> letters from veterinarians who had closed their practices and left town. <br /> Proposals from the veterinary community involved their willingness to consider <br /> performing spays and neuters at the same fees charged by the City's clinic, <br /> with fee-setting being done by a committee of veterinarians, the Humane Society, <br /> and council members. It was also suggested that some provision be made for <br /> low-cost surgeries based on income. While Dr. Penfold questioned increased City <br />e contributions to dog-control activities, Mr. Gleason clarified that, in actuality, <br /> $40,000 less would be spent this year and $90,000 less would have been budgeted <br /> had Springfield and Lane County been able to contribute their usual share. <br /> Dr. Penfold questioned the public health significance of the vaccinations for <br /> FVRC, DHLP, and Parvo. In concluding, Dr. Penfold stated that the three-year <br /> historical period was an insufficient period of time to assess the effects of <br /> the clinic.s program and indicated his disappointment at being unable to obtain <br /> records prior to 1978. <br /> At the conclusion of the presentations, the meeting was opened for questions <br /> and discussion. <br /> In response to Councilor Wooten's question on "typical fees" for spays and <br /> neuters, Dr. Penfold said that while there was a wide fee range among individual <br /> veterinarians, he estimated that 50 percent of the veterinarians and most <br /> of the hospitals performed those surgeries at reduced rates. In addition, <br /> anyone, regardless of income, could obtain a certificate from the Greenhill <br /> Humane Society for reduced rates for surgery at his or her own veterinarian. <br /> Councilor Wooten suggested that staff obtain information on the income level of <br /> users of the City's spay/neuter cl i ni c to determi ne the potenti al of the. cl i ni c <br /> serving exclusively low-income people. <br />-- <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 12, 1983 Page 2 <br />