Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> The following amendments were made to the resolution: Finding 5 on page 1 <br />e after the phrase "Development Assistance and Information Center, and many <br /> other basic," add "public safety." Add Finding 9 which reads, liThe City has <br /> a responsibility to its citizens to provide basic services. These services <br /> include: public safety; social services; parks and recreation; library, <br /> maintenance of streets, public buildings, and other municipal properties; <br /> and the provision of sanitary sewers. Ballot Measure 2 will curtail to a <br /> substantial degree the ability of the City to provide these services." Add <br /> Finding 10, which reads: "10 Adoption of Ballot Measure 2 will provoke <br /> expensive and unproductive litigation. The process set out in the measure for <br /> adoption of new tax measures is uncertain and ambiguous.1I (Members voted on <br /> adoption of these amendments at the end of the meeting.) <br /> Ms. Wooten moved, seconded by Ms. Schue, to adopt the resolution <br /> as amended. Roll call vote. Motion carried unanimously; 7:0. <br /> IV. RESOLUTION RELATING TO HISTORIC STREET TREES (memorandum distributed) <br /> Res. No. 3881--A resolution of the Eugene City Council expres- <br /> sing its opposition to a proposed City Charter <br /> amendment relating to historic street trees. <br /> Mr. Gleason introduced the resolution, which came at the request of the council <br /> and was based on the deliberation of the council previously. <br />e Ms. Wooten said it was inappropriate for the council to go on record regarding <br /> this particular ballot measure because in the past there has been no precedent <br /> for the council to take positions on particular ballot measures aside from <br /> those directly affecting the financial capacity of the City. The resolution <br /> is not appropriate. A simple statement of preference would have sufficed. <br /> The findings are conjecture and speculation. Ms. Wooten cited proposed <br /> finding 3 and said the people objecting to the widening of 6th/7th were not <br /> one in the same with those supporting the ballot measure. In proposed <br /> finding 4, Ms. Wooten said it is not sure construction would be affected by <br /> passage of the ballot measure. She stated that proposed finding 5 was specu- <br /> lative as well. She continued by noting that proposed finding 6 on automatic <br /> delays was not appropriate. The measure only allows people to vote. The <br /> process will not impede progress. <br /> Ms. Bascom opposed the measure. There is a problem working with the State <br /> Department of Transportation. This measure is another indication that Eugene <br /> likes to put special hurdles in the way of completing projects. The pUblic.s <br /> concern for trees could better be expressed in a tree commission which <br /> Ms. Bascom along with the Council planned to establish. Ms. Bascom urged <br /> support for the resolution and for the concept of a tree commission that would <br /> be temporary in its charge. <br /> Mr. Holmer suggested that in the future they should do a better job of educ- <br /> ating the voters. A possible way to do that would be by printing a City <br /> voters pamphlet. Ms. Wooten added that the State puts out a voters pamphlet <br />- <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 26, 1984 Page 3 <br />