Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> IV. SANDING/SNOW PLOWING POLICIES AND PRIORITIES (background <br />e information distributed) <br /> City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the agenda item. Maintenance Superin- <br /> tendent Bob Hammitt briefly reviewed the revised Sanding/Snowplowing Policies <br /> and Priorities document as distributed to the council. He explained that the <br /> map on page 7 of the document pinpointed the first three City priorities and <br /> jurisdictional areas, stating that a fourth priority would be added during an <br /> extended storm. Mr. Hammitt explained that the priorities were based on the <br /> traffic count on roadways, Lane Transit District traffic routes, geographical <br /> constraints, location of emergency services, and the necessity of moving <br /> traffic in and out of the core area. He estimated that City staff would be <br /> able to cover the 100 miles of streets in the first three priorities within <br /> six to eight hours, depending on the time of day and traffic present on the <br /> streets. He also explained that Highway 99, 6th Avenue, and 7th Avenue were <br /> the responsibility of the State Highway Division for sanding and 30th Avenue <br /> fell under the responsibility of Lane County. He also noted that the sanding <br /> and plowing of Mahlon Sweet Airport would be handled as a number one priority. <br /> In reponse to a question by Councilor Ehrman, Mr. Hammitt stated that the City <br /> had four sanders and two snow plows, with additional equipment present at the <br /> airport to handle that area. In response to another question by Ms. Ehrman, <br /> he explained that Garfield Street and Roosevelt Boulevard were number one <br /> priorities because the Maintenance yard is located in that area. In response <br /> to another question, he explained that the LTD buses did little to keep the <br /> streets clear of snow. <br />e Councilor Hansen suggested that the Register-Guard publish a map of the <br /> sanding and plowing priorities as a public service to the community. <br /> Mr. Gleason commented that the Public Works staff made a great commitment to <br /> the implementation of the plan. <br /> V. WORK SESSION: REVIEW OF CITY'S SIDEWALK PROGRAM <br /> City Manager Micheal Gleason introduced the agenda item. City Engineer Bert <br /> Teitzel presented the staff report, explaining that the general policy in the <br /> Transportation Plan and Sidewalk Plan was for all residential and commercial <br /> streets and those industrial streets as specified by the City Council to have <br /> sidewalks. In addition, he stated that any new construction or any alterations <br /> or additions over $5,000 would usually require a sidewalk unless a waiver <br /> was granted under Code provisions. He stated that the Code also addressed <br /> the initiation of sidewalks in those areas where not previously required. <br /> He then introduced Jim Stuart of the Engineering Department who coordinates <br /> most sidewalk projects. <br /> Referring to a flow chart presented to the council, Mr. Teitzel then reviewed <br /> the sidewalk initiation process starting from the initial request from <br /> neighborhood groups, schools, or maintenance staff. He explained that staff, <br /> after making a determination that a specific sidewalk was needed, would <br />e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 14, 1984 Page 4 <br />