Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />III. PUBLIC INFORMATION PROGRAM <br /> <br />Barbara Bellamy, City Information Coordinator, proposed a broad campaign to <br />gather public feedback on both the content and the means of funding the Eugene <br />Agenda. She proposed a three-week period, from July 15 to August 5, to get <br />word to the public. This would be accomplished by staff presentations at reg- <br />ular community group meetings and by town hall meetings within the councilors' <br />wards. The campaign would be geared toward a November election. Public talks <br />during the summer would be followed by a ballot proposal. More meetings would <br />follow to publicize the ballot measure. <br /> <br />Mayor Obie said there were four categories of items: the five Eugene Agenda <br />projects, the proposed new library and new swimming pool/community center, the <br />Federal Revenue Sharing funds issue, and the unfunded balance of the Capital <br />Improvements Program (CIP). The City needed to know what the public's priori- <br />ties were before deciding on a definite package. <br /> <br />Mr. Rutan said the array of programs was large and complicated. He wondered <br />whether town hall meetings would focus issues for the average citizen. <br />Mr. Holmer and Ms. Wooten both felt that City staff should go out with more <br />than questions; some kind of definite proposal was needed, even if it was only <br />provisional. Ms. Ehrman also thought a specific proposal would encourage more <br />public input. <br /> <br />Ms. Schue said it was important to let the community know that these items <br />would not be funded exclusively through public funds. Regarding the summer <br />information program, Ms. Bellamy said she was confident that enough groups <br />could be reached during the four weeks of July. Ms. Ehrman suggested exten- <br />ding the timeline to include the Lane County Fair in the third week of Aug- <br />ust. The deadline for filing the ballot measure will be October 2. <br /> <br />Discussing time outlay for public meetings, Ms. Bellamy said that each coun- <br />cilor would probably organize four meetings, for a total of about 36 meet- <br />ings. Staff will prepare documentation and support material. The length of <br />meetings would be about one hour. She suggested 15-minute slide shows and <br />flow chart presentations followed by general discussion. Ms. Wooten said the <br />impact of public comment may be great. Input must be taken seriously and the <br />councilors must be ready to rework the concept. <br /> <br />Ms. Wooten asked what the combined annual cost of every project presented to <br />council would be on a 20-year amortized basis. Mr. Whitlow said the total <br />cost of $342 million, divided by 20 years, came out to be about $17 million <br />per year. <br /> <br />The meeting resumed at 7:00 p.m. after a ten-minute recess. <br /> <br />After the pUblic <br />1 to October 2 <br />2, the ordinance <br /> <br />Mayor Obie outlined the main goal dates along the timeline. <br />input campaign ending on August 5, the period from September <br />will be spent evaluating and reworking the plan. On October <br />will be adopted. The public will vote on November 5. <br /> <br />The councilors discussed at length which projects should be included in the <br />~ proposal. Mr. Holmer pointed out that the library and swimming pool, which <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council Work Session <br /> <br />June 3, 1985 <br /> <br />~~3 <br />