Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> people with low incomes should be exempted from any income tax that is <br />e approved. Many other ways of financing the agenda, or part of it, were sug- <br /> gested. These included a gas tax, a county-wide port district, a transaction <br /> tax, a personal property tax, a local sales tax, a serial levy, user fees, a <br /> county-wide income tax, a utility tax, a restaurant tax, a municipally owned <br /> cable TV, a TV license fee, and parking fees. <br /> Mayor Obie asked someone from each table to report the main points in the <br /> discussion. <br /> Councilor Ehrman said people at her table thought the income tax should be <br /> voted on again in ten years. They also wondered if attendance at the meeting <br /> was broad enough to reflect the community. <br /> Councilor Miller reported that heople at his table talked about the end of the <br /> income tax, but they realized t at operating funds will be needed for the new <br /> proj ec ts . They also discussed a low-income shelter. Councilor Bascom <br /> reported a discussion about an exemption for people with low incomes and a TV <br /> tax. Councilor Schue reported a consensus favoring a three quarters of one <br /> percent income tax with no exemptions. Cathy Freedman reported a discussion <br /> of a community fund-raising effort for the library expansion and swimming pool <br /> and a port district designation "for the airport. <br /> People at Councilor Holmer's table were concerned about the operating costs of <br /> the Eugene Agenda projects. Councilor Holmer told them the operating costs <br /> have been estimated. People at Councilor Wooten's table did not think a local <br />e income tax will pass. They suggested the agenda projects should be presented <br /> separately on a ballot. They suggested an airport district be extended to <br /> other counties to finance the airport expansion. Some people wondered if a <br /> business and corporate income tax should be approved. <br /> People at Councilor Rutan's table thought the income tax should be dedicated <br /> to speci fi c projects and shoul d "sunset. II Mike Gleason said those at his <br /> table thought the projects are a good community investment and should be init- <br /> i a ted . They suggested an initial one half of one percent income tax which <br /> could be dropped to one quarter of one percent in ten years. Chris Andersen <br /> reported a consensus that user fees and other revenues the projects will gen- <br /> erate should be used. Bob Shelby said people at his table indicated that more <br /> public comment on the agenda is needed and agreed that many of the projects <br /> will affect communities other than Eugene. <br /> The people at Susan Brody's tabled discussed the "sunsetting" of the income <br /> tax. James Meeks said people at his table wondered how the City will tell <br /> people who work in the city and live outside it that their income will be <br /> taxed. Pat Decker said people discussed the fact that several agenda projects <br /> serve other communities and wondered if an income tax will be approved by the <br /> citizens. <br /> Elaine Stewart reported comments about the importance of projects that will <br /> create jobs and private investment in the community and an exclusion from the <br /> income tax for people with low incomes. Marge Beck reported comments about <br /> the importance of University of Oregon involvement in the Riverfront Research <br />'. <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council July 10, 1985 Page 3 <br />