Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Councilor Hansen had received a call from a Springfield councilor who asked <br />e the Eugene council to delay a vote on the income tax until the three jurisdic- <br /> tions could agree on a way to pay for the three projects. However, Mr. Hansen <br /> thought a delay would not decrease the difficult choices. He favored giving <br /> the citizens a chance to vote. He said a new income source was first consi- <br /> dered to fund the CIP. The library expansion was then included in the pack- <br /> age, but the expansion would necessitate an additional $350,000 in operating <br /> funds for the library. Mr. Hansen did not think a commitment to expand the <br /> library should be made until funding for its operation is assured. He noted <br /> that the school districts, the University of Oregon, and Lane Community <br /> College have libraries. He said a commitment to expand the library would <br /> indicate that the library has a higher priority than the police and fire <br /> departments. He favored an income tax of one-quarter of one percent which <br /> would pay for the airport and provide some funds for the CIP. It would mean <br /> the community would have to seek funds from other sources such as the Federal <br /> government and the State lottery. He said some bonds will be paid off in six <br /> years and then property taxes should go down. Perhaps a library could be <br /> financed then. <br /> Mr. Miller said Eugeneans place a higher priority on capital investments than <br /> some people in other cities do. The capital investments make the city a good <br /> place to live. He could support an income tax of one-third to one-half of one <br /> percent. He emphasized the importance of terminating part or all of the <br /> income tax in 25 years. He said the council should present a proposal to the <br /> community for a vote because the community has indicated it wants the airport <br /> and library expanded and the CIP projects maintained. He said the citizens of <br />e the metropolitan area benefit from capital projects of the city, and people <br /> who benefit should help pay for them. Therefore, he had no problem with the <br /> cummuter tax. <br /> Ms. Wooten said her experience this summer talking to constituents, social <br /> service agencies, and members of clubs was good. Councilors had responded to <br /> comments received from the public. She had been influenced by the testimony <br /> before the council and other councilors' thoughts about the best package to <br /> refer to the voters. She said some people in her ward have lower incomes than <br /> people in other wards. She said regional capital projects benefit people who <br /> work in the city but live outside the city. She suggested a commuter differ- <br /> ential so that those people would pay one-quarter of one percent income tax. <br /> She agreed they should receive free library cards. She had proposed an exclu- <br /> sion for people earning $5,000 a year or less, but she thought that exclusion <br /> should be raised to $7,500. She favored an income tax of four-tenths of one <br /> percent. She said the airport, library, and the CIP may have to be cut back <br /> to permit the low-income exclusion and the commuter differential. <br /> Ms. Ehrman said Mayor Obie's five point Eugene Agenda enabled the council and <br /> the community to focus on the future. The council added three projects for <br /> public consideration. Councilors attended many meetings to learn what the <br /> citizens wanted. The airport and library expansion and the CIP program <br /> emerged with most support. Commenting on the testimony at the council's pub- <br /> lic hearing, Ms. Ehrman discussed user fees for the airport and the library, <br /> an increase in property taxes, and the gas tax. She said federal laws pro- <br /> hibit fees for airline passengers. Efforts to change the federal laws <br />e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 25, 1985 Page 3 <br />