Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Ms. Wooten responded to Ms. Ehrmanls concern, saying she had been involved <br /> - with the Riverfront project from the beginning and continued to support the <br /> project and the agreement. She added, however, that she saw as difficult the <br /> issue of appointments excluding from involvement in the intergovernmental <br /> commission employees of the university and of the State Board of Higher <br /> Education. Ms. Wooten said she thought a representative of the university <br /> scientific community or another expert should be involved. Ms. Briner said <br /> the University president had strongly requested that provision, and she added <br /> that City employees also did not serve on advisory boards and commissions. <br /> Mayor Obie said he found the agreernent satisfactory. Ms. Wooten said it did <br /> not appear the problem could be resolved, and she suggested forming an ad hoc <br /> group to hear frorn university faculty, students, and citizens. She added that <br /> she felt the previous criticism of process needed to be dispelled by a correct <br /> mechanism to allow public participation. <br /> Ms. Ehrman asked about the search for a developer, saying she had felt com- <br /> fortable with the project because a developer already had been chosen. <br /> Ms. Briner said the previous search had been mostly regional, rather than <br /> national. She also said the university representatives had been advised by <br /> legal counsel to undertake a more rigorous national search. Ms. Briner said <br /> UO President Paul Olum had talked with the developer, who was willing to <br /> continue with the process of submitting the required proposals and qualifica- <br /> tions. She said by the time the search process was complete, the commission <br /> should have been formed to review the applicants, and the ultimate responsi- <br /> bility for the decision would lie with the university president and with the <br /> City Council. Stan Long, of the City Attorneyls Office, said one consequence <br /> e of the change to a public/public partnership was the absolute requirement of <br /> compliance with the public contracting law Chapter 279, which had not been rnet <br /> under the previous non-profit arrangement. <br /> Ms. Schue said she was satisfied with the language as long as agreement exist- <br /> ed as to the meaning. She said she hoped the commission would include someone <br /> with a broad public background and a general knowlege of the community, and <br /> would not consist only of bankers, realtors, etc. Mayor Obie agreed and said <br /> he intended to meet with councilors and with the university president in an <br /> attempt to represent a variety of interests. <br /> Responding to Ms. Wootenls question, Ms. Briner said existing standards and <br /> criteria, such as the Eugene Refinement Plan, campus planning constraints, and <br /> President Olum's restriction on research harmful to human life, were being <br /> attached to the requests for proposals being sent out nationwide. <br /> Ms. Ehrman noted the metarnorphosis that had occurred in the project structure <br /> since its inception and the larger role now being played by the City, adding <br /> that she hoped the change would help to solve some of the problems. <br /> CB 2862--An ordinance creating a Riverfront Research Park <br /> Commission; amending Section 2.013 of the Eugene Code, <br /> 1971; adding Sections 2.220, 2.222, 2.224, and 2.226 to <br /> that code; and declaring an emergency. <br /> e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 20, 1985 Page 4 <br />