Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> II. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> e A. Planning Commission's Recommendation on the Draft Environmental <br /> Impact Statement for the 6th/7th Extension Project <br /> (memo, background distributed) <br /> City Manager Mike Gleason introduced the item. Dave Reinhard of the Public <br /> Works Department presented the staff report. He said proposed alternate <br /> routes 1 and 2 were shown in the wall display. <br /> He described the Planning Commission's recommendation for Alternate 1, saying <br /> the State would make the final decision, and the City's role would be <br /> advisory. He said the Planning Commission recommended shifting the roadway <br /> north as outlined in part 2 of the memo because of landowners' requests for a <br /> more logical division of property. Mr. Reinhard described the proposal for an <br /> elevated roadway at the eastern end of the project between the area of Conger <br /> and Highway 99 in order to preserve local circulation at grade and eliminate <br /> interference with railroad spurs. He said part 4, dealing with wetland <br /> mitigation, had been arrived at based on testimony that those were the most <br /> significant areas. Mr. Reinhard also described part 5, calling for <br /> consideration of the Amazon-Fern Ridge bike path when the final design work is <br /> done. <br /> He described the process for council consideration, including tonight's <br /> hearing and consideration for action at the December 4 meeting. He said the <br /> State Department of Transportation would hold a hearing on December 18 and <br /> e would issue a recommendation and analysis of testimony at approximately the <br /> end of January, when it would return to the City Council. <br /> Mr. Hansen opened the public hearing. <br /> Jeri Cohen, 825 East Park, Eugene, representing the Willamette Valley Company <br /> located at 660 McKinley Street, said the company was concerned about the east <br /> end of the proposed project, where Alternate 1 would bisect company property. <br /> She submitted written comments and asked that the council seriously consider <br /> retaining the 5th/7th one-way grid system as a feasible alternative to either <br /> of the routes being proposed. She said the recommended route would make <br /> continuation of business impossible at the present location, and would have <br /> financial impacts on Eugene and Lane County. <br /> Jim Saul, 111 West 7th Avenue, Eugene, representing Bradley Trust, owners of <br /> 63 acres extending from Danebo to Terry Street at the western end of the <br /> project, said the proposed route would affect Bradley Trust, and they strongly <br /> supported the recommendation submitted by the Planning Commission and urged <br /> that the council proceed with the project. He said they recognized that <br /> changes might be necessary, but were convinced that the facility was of <br /> critical importance to the entire city and to the west Eugene area. <br /> Peter lafferty, employed at 310 Seneca Road, Eugene, spoke in opposition to <br /> all three alternatives. He said Eugene eventually would need a better <br /> east-west corridor, such as 1-105, which was already 60 percent in place. <br /> Mr. Lafferty said 6th and 7th would not carry the amount of traffic that would <br /> e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council November 25, 1985 Page 3 <br />