Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Rogers indicated that seismic design, which deals with earthquakest <br />represents the first real change to the model code since 1976. These code <br />changes come as a result of increased information about the forces which are <br />applied to buildings during earthquakes. <br /> <br />Mr. Rogers said that the chapter of the code which deals with skylights is <br />specific to Oregon. This change has made the requirements less restrictive <br />in.some cases. <br /> <br />Energy conservationt a change which is also specific to the State, attempts <br />to make the code easier to apply in order to promote conservation practices. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Ms. Bascomt Mr. Rogers said that when an <br />amendment is made, the City is required to reprint the entire page of the <br />code that was revised even if only minor wording modifications were made. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman asked whether changes in the code are applied only to new <br />construction and new permits or whether they are also applied retroactively. <br />Mr. Rogers indicated that while updated code requirements apply to the <br />construction of all new buildings and any new additions to a buildingt it <br />does not necessarily bring the entire building into compliance with the <br />revised codes. <br /> <br />Mr. Boles asked how this information is integrated with HAl-MAT requirements. <br />In response, Mr. Rogers said that this information closely corresponds to <br />HAl-MAT standards and is applied at the time of plan review and inspection. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Boles asked how code enforcement is monitored. <br />inspectiont construction is inspected to check for <br />difficult, howevert to ensure compliance with code <br />inspection has been made. <br /> <br />Mr. Rogers said that upon <br />compliance. It is <br />requirements after <br /> <br />Ken Nagao, Building Construction Advisory Committee (BCAC) Chairt spoke about <br />the relationship between BCAC and the City. Seven members of the community <br />make up the committee which represents and serves as a sounding board for a <br />broad cross-section of citizens in the construction industry. <br />Most of the complaints which have come to BCAC have revolved around <br />coordination and communication between the Fire Department and the Building <br />Department. Mr. Nagao emphasized the importance of maintaining consistency <br />in the application of building codes. <br /> <br />Mr. Nagao noted that a plan review audit recently conducted by the State <br />revealed that the City.s building department was reviewing building plans <br />with the same degree of intensity as the State has recommended. The <br />committee itself has also compared our building department with that of Salem <br />and Washington County, and has also concluded that plans are being reviewed <br />similarly. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Nagao indicated that decreasing the time for building permit issuance is <br />paramountly important across the industry. He noted that developers within <br />the industry that have attended BCAC meetings have indicated that they would <br />support an increase in user fees, if a decrease in plan review time can be <br />attained. Mr. Eveleth pointed out that the method by which the City can <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 31t 1990 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />