Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />helping others secure a larger market share. She urged the council to <br />reexamine its goals for revising the Sign Code. <br /> <br />Cheryle Hawkins, 1350 Bailey Avenue, maintained that the proposed revisions, <br />particularly as they apply to billboards, would adversely affect her means of <br />livelihood as an independent subcontractor. She urged consideration of the <br />code's impact on jobs and suggested that subcontractors legislated out of the <br />market should be compensated. Ms. Hawkins recommended that an ad hoc <br />committee be formed, with industry representation, to further consider <br />revisions to the Sign Code. <br /> <br />Michael Armstrong, 50 Highway 99N, identified himself as the vice president <br />of Pacific Petroleum. He said that his industry has attempted to consolidate <br />signs and eliminate clutter and voiced concern about excessive restrictions <br />that could harm business. <br /> <br />Al Johnson, 767 Willamette Street, Suite 203, distributed a memorandum on <br />behalf of National Advertising Company. Mr. Johnson concurred with comments <br />made by previous speakers in support of a content-neutral sign code that is <br />more workable. He identified several legal issues in need of resolution and <br />expressed particular concern regarding amortization. Mr. Johnson urged the <br />council to more carefully consider the proposed reduction of billboard size <br />from 300 square feet to 200 square feet. <br /> <br />Randy Prince, 1819 Columbia Street, spoke on behalf of Common Ground. He <br />said that if compensation is to be paid for value lost, then created value <br />must be collected. Mr. Prince maintained that whenever privileges are <br />assigned by governments, it is difficult to apply regulations to affect <br />everyone equally. He suggested charging a fee for the privilege of <br />displaying signs. <br /> <br />Mr. Gardner submitted a letter from Larry Anderson for the record. <br /> <br />There being no additional requests to speak, Mayor Miller closed the public <br />hearing. <br /> <br />Mr. Chenkin requested additional time for staff to prepare a written response <br />to the issues raised during public testimony. <br /> <br />Ms. Schue commented on the importance of fairness in public hearings and <br />suggested that some speakers may not have been given adequate time to express <br />themselves. Mayor Miller indicated that the public hearing could be <br />reopened. <br /> <br />Councilors agreed to defer their decision on this ordinance until after it <br />has been considered at a work session. They asked that specific concerns <br />relating to billboards, automobile dealerships, gas stations, sandwich <br />boards, amortization, and shopping center districts be addressed in that <br />discussion. Individual councilors agreed to provide staff with lists of <br />additional issues. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 14, 1990 <br /> <br />Page 4 <br />