Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> I <br /> I <br /> e I. NEDCO <br /> Mr. Bennett noted that he recently received a copy of a memo from NEDCO, a <br /> nonprofit neighborhood development corporation, which is attempting to dis- <br /> pose of a City-owned site to be replaced with a new, low-income family hous- <br /> I. ing unit. He highlighted the importance of timing in these negotiations and <br /> requested that this project move forward as quickly as possible. <br /> The council offered its general agreement that the information contained <br /> within the memo was sufficient and urged staff to proceed with this project. <br /> J. Countywide Serial Levy--Universal Library Card <br /> Assistant City Manager Dave Whitlow said that the Countywide serial levy <br /> failed with 54 percent of city voters voting in opposition. At the request <br /> of council, Mr. Whitlow agreed to provide the council with a report on the <br /> election results broken down by precinct and information on available supple- <br /> mental budget moneys. <br /> II. WORK S ESS ION: LIBRARY SITING DECISION <br /> Hillary Kittleson, Planning and Development Department, briefly reported on <br /> the library siting decision. She noted that this work session is a follow-up <br /> to the council's May 23 discussion at which time the council requested addi- <br /> tional analysis on the Sears building and possible financing means. <br /> e Since that time, additional analyses have been done on the Sears building, <br /> including floor x-rays and a preliminary examination of possible environmen- <br /> tal impacts. Ms. Kittleson noted that the engineer has indicated that the <br /> floors would require reinforcement, but that the cost of reinforcement will <br /> be substantially less than originally predicted. <br /> Ms. Kittleson pointed out that there was an error in the original cost formu- <br /> lations for the Sears building redevelopment that were provided in the staff <br /> notes and provided the council with a revision of cost figures. <br /> Ms. Kittleson indicated that the Eugene Public Library Board met on June 27, <br /> 1990, and drafted a resolution indicating its support for a March 1991 elec- <br /> tion date, encouraging the council to consider a minimum of 100,000 square <br /> feet for the new library building regardless of its location, and encouraging <br /> the council to consider how parking needs might be met at each site. <br /> Mr. Holmer moved, seconded by Ms. Bascom, to proceed with the <br /> March time line as described in the staff notes. Roll call <br /> vote; the motion carried unanimously, 6:0. <br /> Mr. Holmer asked whether the soon-to-be-vacant Bon Marche building might be <br /> given consideration as a possible library siting location. In response, Ms. <br /> Kittleson noted that The Bon Marche building was given some very preliminary <br /> consideration by the City Council in 1988 as a potential library site. She <br /> e MINUTES--Eugene City Council June 27, 1990 Page 3 <br />