Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e implement the plan, and the time lines for implementation were then estab- <br /> lished. Or. Luke cautioned that if the plan is not integrated into the or- <br /> ganization's budget, it will fail. He said a successful community strategic <br /> plan involves a multiplicity of agencies, not only the city organization. <br /> This means that those agencies must "buy into" the plan as well. Dr. luke <br /> termed the process he had described (assessment, vision, implementation) a <br /> "meta model." <br /> Mr. Perry asked if the success of the model Dr. luke described was related to <br /> the number of the parties involved. Dr. luke said the success was achieved <br /> by involving key stakeholders in the community in the process from the begin- <br /> ning to the end. Councilor-elect Nicholson asked what made a stakeholder a <br /> "key" stakeholder. Dr. Luke said key stakeholders were those with influence <br /> on the vitality and quality of life in the community. Mr. Nicholson asked if <br /> the lack of active outreach to people who chose not to be key stakeholders <br /> was a problem. Dr. luke said yes; it was important to reach those people, <br /> who might not participate as stakeholders, but should be included in the <br /> process. This can be achieved through community forums, focus groups, and <br /> town meetings. He added that participation cannot be forced. Mr. Nicholson <br /> expressed concern over the use of the phrase "key stakeholder." He felt it <br /> implied a process where some might exert undue influence over the process. <br /> Dr. Luke reiterated that it was important to ensure that other voices are <br /> heard in the process. This meant that a channel for such communication must <br /> be built into the process. He said that Portland had not only used community <br /> forums but a community survey to ensure that all perspectives are considered. <br /> e Mr. Boles observed that the City of Eugene already does a considerable amount <br /> of public outreach at the present time. He asked how the process Dr. Luke <br /> was describing differed from the process already in place. Dr. Luke said he <br /> was unsure of how the City's citizen outreach process operated. He said the <br /> City could use its existing Citizen Involvement Committee as a basic policy <br /> committee, if it chose. He did not think that the City should assemble an- <br /> other body if there was already a policy body in operation that could serve <br /> as a planning team. Ms. Rich said the City already uses a community goals- <br /> setting process that includes citizen input. Dr. Luke said strategic plan- <br /> ning was different from goals-setting in that goals-setting generally focuses <br /> on one- to two-year outcomes. Strategic planning focuses on the longer term, <br /> and entails a look at the worldwide trends that will affect the community. <br /> Mr. Rutan noted that those present constituted a cross-section of the City's <br /> Budget Committee. He said that the City has gone through a budgeting process <br /> that will not continue to work for the community. Strategic planning has <br /> been offered to the committee as a way to get out of the cycle it is in now <br /> regarding budgeting. Mr. Rutan said the committee was seeking a process <br /> wherein the Budget Committee or community can examine financial and service <br /> issues and reach positive, constructive solutions for the City's financial <br /> and service problems. Mr. Rutan said the committee or some other group must <br /> come up with solutions or local government faces dramatic decisions. Mr. <br /> Nicholson asked Mr. Rutan if he saw the process as a proposal for a better <br /> way to set priorities. Mr. Rutan said while he wanted to know more, he saw <br /> e MINUTES--Strategic Plan Committee November 1, 1990 Page 4 <br />