Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />3. Do citizens favor additional expenditures for affordable housing <br />construction, community policing, improved fire department re- <br />sponse time, a new library, and/or enhanced tourism and arts pro- <br />grams? <br /> <br />4. Is there support for new revenues to balance the budget or pay for <br />services? What revenues are considered most desirable? Least <br />desirable? Is there support to decrease taxes but increase user <br />fees for a service? <br /> <br />Mr. Weeks described the three instruments used to gather public information. <br />He said there are two categories of data collection instruments: those that <br />are administered in a manner intended to produce a statistically representa- <br />tive sample and those which are not administered in that fashion. The first <br />instrument is called "Ivory." It is a basic questionnaire that tends to <br />produce an exaggerated picture of public support for programs. It would <br />likewise produce information about user fees and other subjects in this man- <br />ner. The advantage, he said, is that it is easy to administer and has a high <br />response rate. <br /> <br />The second instrument used, "Blue," included information about service costs. <br />It also asked questions about the level of user fees one wishes to pay. With <br />this additional information, the instrument provided results that were more <br />realistic. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />II BOB" (build your own budget), the third instrument, presented the $8 million <br />projected deficit and then provided respondents an opportunity to select any <br />or all service enhancements. In addition, respondents could reduce any of 40 <br />services; or they could choose revenues. <br /> <br />Mr. Weeks said three instruments were used because the information requested <br />was voluminous. Also, using BOB was risky; if BOB failed to draw an adequate <br />response rate, there would still be enough information from the other two <br />instruments to draw conclusions. Mr. Weeks said that the instruments each <br />provided a separate piece of information. Together they provided a larger, <br />more textured picture. He noted the response rates (73, 70, and 53 percent, <br />respectively) were unusually high. The margin errors were as follows: 5 <br />percent for Ivory, 6 percent for Blue, and 7 percent for BOB. <br /> <br />Mr. Weeks noted that the tabloid and workshops were not administered with the <br />expectation that a statistically representative sample would be obtained. <br />Instead, it was an important means by which the City could engage in a con- <br />versation with as many citizens as wanted to participate. He said 1,052 <br />people responded with the tabloid. The workshop process involved 78 groups, <br />generally with six to nine people in a group. <br /> <br />Mr. Weeks reviewed responses to the first question from all three instru- <br />ments. Seventy-five percent of BOB respondents favored a combination of <br />approaches to solve the budget deficit. Only 10 percent chose service reduc- <br />tions only, and 13.4 percent balanced the budget exclusively through the use <br />of additional revenue. Both the tabloid and the workshop process yielded <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />January 13, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />