Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />plan, the undergrounding of utilities in the Highway 99 area, and road im- <br />provements on Bethel Drive. <br /> <br />Mr. Croteau said it is important to note that a serial levy and a general <br />obligation bond can only be used for capital projects, excluding programs <br />such as a residential rehabilitation loan program. Responding to a question <br />from Ms. Bascom, he said that a serial levy is within the Ballot Measure 5 <br />$10 cap because there is no debt issue. The general obligation bond is out- <br />side the cap. He explained that tax increment financing may be used for <br />projects and programs other than capital projects, though only the portion <br />that is debt financing is outside the $10 cap. <br /> <br />Mr. Croteau reviewed the CAC's four recommendations on page 7 of the report. <br />He noted two contingencies placed on proceeding with a serial levy or general <br />obligation bond: 1) continue to work with the Eugene Water and Electric <br />Board to obtain funding for burying the utilities underground; and 2) develop <br />a project cost, below the full estimated $3 million, that taxpayers are like- <br />ly to approve in a vote. He noted that the EWEB Board is meeting next week <br />to discuss development of a policy to assist in these types of undergrounding <br />projects. The recommendations of the CAC included proceeding with an update <br />of the Whiteaker Refinement Plan and investigating the need for a land-use <br />plan update in the Bethel Triangle area. <br /> <br />Responding to a question from Ms. Bascom, Mr. Croteau said that <br />$12,000-$14,000 of the $125,000 cap for the study group's effort has been <br />spent thus far. He noted that part of that money was to pay for having EWEB <br />proceed with the design work, but the City has yet to enter into a design <br />agreement. <br /> <br />In response to another question from Ms. Bascom, Mr. Boles said that the <br />council decided to earmark the money for these two projects because of their <br />importance. Jan Childs, Planning Division Manager, said that in addition to <br />the proposed update of the Whiteaker Neighborhood Plan, two other projects <br />were rated as equally important by the Planning Commission. They are comple- <br />tion of the residential lands study and work required related to code revi- <br />sions for implementation of State Goal 12 Transportation Rule. <br /> <br />Mr. Boles said that the CAC couples the Whiteaker Refinement Plan update to <br />an urban renewal district process in response to an issue raised by staff <br />about funding projects that might come out of the plan update through that <br />process. <br /> <br />Responding to Mr. Robinette, Mr. Boles said that the $125,000 study funding <br />is earmarked out of the Contingency Fund. Any remaining balance, along with <br />funding out of next fiscal year's budget, will be applied to the refinement <br />plan projects. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman arrived at the meeting. <br /> <br />Mayor Miller explained that the Highway 99 project will go forward as it is <br />already funded. Under discussion is leveraging other projects along with it. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />March 2, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />