Laserfiche WebLink
<br />tary compensation for efficiency suggestions, but said staff would look into <br />~ the possibility. <br /> <br />Bob Hammitt, Director of Public Works Maintenance Division, reviewed the <br />details of the PARCS/PW merger. He said the merger would result in savings <br />due to economies of scale, elimination of duplicated services, and central- <br />ization of purchasing. He added that the PARCS/PW merger will require remod- <br />eling work at both the Roosevelt and Cheshire facilities. <br /> <br />Mr. Hammitt said that the City would also realize savings from streamlining <br />the mowing programs operated by the two divisions. In addition, the City is <br />developing cooperative mowing agreements with the school district for mowing <br />of City-owned parcels located adjacent to school property. In response to a <br />question from Mr. MacDonald, Mr. Hammitt confirmed that all agreements re- <br />garding IIno mowll or IIreduced mow" zones would remain in effect. Mr. Hammitt <br />added that staff is considering redUCing mowing of undeveloped City-owned <br />property to the legal minimum required by code for private properties. <br /> <br />Mr. Hammitt explained that the PARCS/PW merger had resulted in elimination of <br />3.5 General Fund positions; I position was transferred out of the General <br />Fund. Ms. Ehrman inquired about the criteria for transferring positions from <br />the General Fund to non-General Fund accounts. Mr. Hammit explained that the <br />main criteria is whether the service provided is eligible. The second crite- <br />ria is to determine that the fund has the capacity to handle the additional <br />expense. Mr. Gleason added that legal restrictions on user-fee services and <br />services funded by taxes also apply. <br /> <br />In response to a question from Ms. Bascom, Mr. Gleason stated that the Public <br />Works facility located on Roosevelt Boulevard is more centrally located than <br />the Lincoln Street facility and meets the needs of the merged division bet- <br />ter. Mr. Hammitt added that the Cheshire facility will remain in operation <br />as the headquarters of the Facilities Section of the division. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Mr. Green left the meeting at 12:15 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Wong said that staff's recommendation for financing these improvements <br />included selling the lincoln Street site and issuing an interfund loan from <br />the Fleet Fund to the General Capital Projects Fund. He said that several <br />inquiries have already been received regarding purchase of the site; if the <br />REI project at the former Eugene Planing Mill site goes through, interest in <br />the site should increase. Ms. Bascom commented that this would be a good <br />location for a housing project. <br /> <br />Mr. Boles suggested prorating some of the cost of remodeling at the Roosevelt <br />and Cheshire sites to non-General Funds, based on the assumption that it is <br />appropriate for non-General Fund facilities to bear their fair share of the <br />cost of capital improvements to maintenance facilities. <br /> <br />Mr. Gleason noted that the financing methods recommended by staff are essen- <br />tially cash-neutral, provided that the Lincoln Street site is sold. In addi- <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br /> <br />May 13, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />