Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />The commission unanimously chose correcting the plan/zone conflicts in the <br />Eugene Commercial lands and Industrial lands studies as the first priority. <br />This project is scheduled to begin after the adoption of the two studies. <br /> <br />Three projects received six votes each for a second priority status: 1) <br />update of the Whiteaker Refinement Plan, which has not been updated since <br />1978; 2) transportation-related zoning revisions regarding the City Council's <br />transportation goals, the State Transportation Planning Rule, and implementa- <br />tion priorities of the Commercial Lands Study and the Willakenzie Refinement <br />Plan; and 3) the Residential Lands Study. All three projects are scheduled to <br />begin in July 1992. <br /> <br />Mr. MacDonald stated that he strongly supported encouraging alternative modes <br />of transportation and agreed with the high priority status it was given by the <br />commission. He said that City Council priorities and Statewide mandates <br />provide an opportunity for cooperation and coordination of the Planning <br />Commission and the City Council to work on land use and transportation issues. <br /> <br />Ms. Sirnio continued that the Airport Vicinity/Highway 99 Refinement Plan and <br />the Growth Management Review Implementation each received five votes for the <br />third priority status. She mentioned that the Airport project provides an <br />opportunity for the commission to engage in proactive planning in an area that <br />is not fully developed. <br /> <br />Ms. Ehrman arrived (5:50 p.m.). <br /> <br />Regarding the Growth Management project, Ms. Sirnio said that last year the <br />commission focused its discussions on the annexation policy as it applies to <br />the River Road/Santa Clara area. She said that this year, the commission will <br />broaden its discussion to include overall policies as well as different <br />strategies for different areas or neighborhoods. <br /> <br />Revision of commercial zones and establishing minimum densities for medium- <br />and high-density residential development each received four votes for a fourth <br />priority status. Revising commercial zones would involve reviewing the City's <br />overall commercial zoning regulations and would address use and design <br />recommendations from the Eugene Commercial Lands Study. Mr. Tollenaar added <br />that this would provide the commission with an opportunity to clearly distin- <br />guish the neighborhood commercial zone. Establishing minimum residential <br />densities would also involve amending the Eugene code. <br /> <br />Ms. Wojahn stated that each commissioner was limited to a certain number of <br />votes, but that all projects have full support of the commission. <br /> <br />Regarding the coordination of transportation and land use planning, Mr. Evans <br />emphasized the importance of community education. Mr. Boles stated that a <br />framework must be developed that allows City Council, the Planning Commission, <br />other jurisdictions, and all other neighborhood organizations to be involved <br />in land use and transportation planning. <br /> <br />MINUTES--Eugene City Council <br />Planning Commission-5:30 <br /> <br />May 26, 1992 <br /> <br />Page 2 <br />