Laserfiche WebLink
M I N U T E S <br /> <br /> <br />Eugene City Council <br />McNutt Room—City Hall—777 Pearl Street <br />Eugene, Oregon <br /> <br /> June 11, 2008 <br /> Noon <br /> <br />COUNCILORS PRESENT: Bonny Bettman, Chris Pryor, Betty Taylor, Jennifer Solomon, George Poling, <br />Andrea Ortiz, Mike Clark, Alan Zelenka. <br /> <br /> Her Honor Mayor Kitty Piercy called the work session of the Eugene City Council to order. <br /> <br />A. ACTION: <br />Coordinated Population Projections <br /> <br /> <br />City Manager Jon Ruiz said the purpose of the work session was to receive direction from the council regarding <br />beginning the process of establishing a population forecast for Eugene in order to comply with requirements of House <br />Bill 3337. He introduced Lisa Gardner, of the Planning and Development Department, to present the topic. <br /> <br />Ms. Gardner stated that the comprehensive lands assessment studies required by HB 3337 required that a 20-year <br />population forecast be established for both Springfield and Eugene much earlier than the County’s next periodic <br />review. She said the County had delegated preparation of the population forecast to Lane Council of Governments <br />(LCOG), but in April 2008 the Board of County Commissioners had rejected LCOG’s forecast and decided to wait <br />until its next periodic review to conduct a population forecast. She said the County had rescinded that action and <br />would be conducting a population forecast sooner than the next periodic review. She said state statutes allow cities <br />to use a “safe harbor” approach to establishing population forecasts if a coordinated number is not otherwise <br />available. She said City staff had reviewed several options and determined that the safe harbor approach was the <br />best strategy for moving forward; Springfield staff had made the same determination and there was an opportunity to <br />be more efficient by preparing one joint Metro Plan amendment that would allow each jurisdiction to take its own <br />path. <br /> <br />Ms. Gardner said the council was being asked to initiate a Metro Plan amendment process, but doing so did not <br />commit the City to a population figure. She said an amendment process would allow input and questions when it <br />went before the Planning Commission and the council. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked about the impact of the County’s most recent action on Eugene’s use of the safe harbor approach. <br />Ms. Gardner said County staff was preparing materials for a June 25, 2008, work session that would include four <br />options for the board’s consideration, none of which would preclude moving forward with the safe harbor approach <br />or render a safe harbor population number irrelevant. She said safe harbor would assume a steady 1.31 percent <br />growth rate for the urban population projected over the 20-year period. <br /> <br />Ms. Bettman asked if establishing a population projection was a requirement of HB 3337. City Attorney Emily <br />Jerome explained that the bill required the City to demonstrate it was providing sufficient buildable lands to <br />accommodate housing needs for 20 years and a 20-year population forecast was required to begin that process. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />MINUTES—Eugene City Council June 11, 2008 Page 1 <br /> Work Session <br /> <br />