Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e technically feasible, noting it has undergone extensive public discussion <br /> already and it will avoid being in conflict with other ballot measures. <br /> Responding to questions, Mr. Gary said that the council has two options. One <br /> is to wait and adopt its election code revision, which is currently before the <br /> Citizen Involvement Committee. Or the council can declare an emergency in its <br /> resolution placing the measure on the ballot. The difference between the two <br /> approaches is that in the home-rule approach, the council is conducting the <br /> vote and it is required to be by mail, and it would likely be challenged by <br /> the Secretary of State. The statutory route is not subject to challenge, and <br /> the determination of whether an emergency exists rests with the City and also <br /> is not open to challenge. <br /> Mr. Robinette noted that the County Board of Commissioners hopes to put its <br /> serial levy on the March 1993 ballot. <br /> Responding to a question from Mr. Robinette, Mr. Gary said the council has <br /> three options: <br /> 1) Pass the implementing ordinance prior to the charter amendment vote. It <br /> would be subject to referendum, but the referendum would take at least <br /> 101 days to be put on the ballot from the date that it is passed; <br /> 2) Refer both the ordinance and charter amendment on the same ballot, <br /> preventing a subsequent referral; and <br />e 3) Enact the ordinance after the charter amendment. This would not defeat <br /> a referendum, but force it after there has been a vote. <br /> Several councilors favored an early election. A straw vote revealed that Ms. <br /> Bascom, Ms. Ehrman, Mr. MacDonald, and Mr. Nicholson preferred holding an <br /> election before March. Mayor Miller asked staff to include the shortest <br /> possible time line for an election on the checklist of issues for its meeting <br /> of September 30. <br /> b. Gasoline Tax <br /> Mr. Robinette felt the gas tax should be one cent on the gallon because that <br /> is what was presented to the public in Eugene Decisions. He added that the <br /> County Board of Commissioners is pursuing a countywide gasoline tax--another <br /> good reason for reducing the City's tax to one cent. <br /> Mr. Nicholson said that the council should put off consideration of a gas tax <br /> until it has settled on the restaurant tax. <br /> Mr. Rutan noted that the Revenue Committee presented the council with a list <br /> of issues regarding the gas tax. Important among those issues is competitive- <br /> ness among the three jurisdictions. He added that the council should give <br /> this tax the same level of consideration it gave to the restaurant tax. <br />e <br /> MINUTES--Eugene City Council September 28, 1992 Page 4 <br /> 5:30 p.m. <br />