Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />(0475) <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />(0532) <br /> <br />(0678) <br /> <br />(0639) <br />e <br /> <br />The 1990 Plan does recommend community commercial center at the northeast quadrant <br />of Delta and Belt Line intersection, he said, so on the basis of those considera- <br />tions the present proposal was recommended. He presented slides showing the <br />various zones recommended which staff feels do comply with the General Plan - <br />community commercial adjacent to Eugene Sand & Gravel east of Delta withoInte- <br />grated Neighborhood Shopping sign district designation, limited multiple-family <br />with gradation of density between the commercial and the mobile home park to the <br />east, and commercial, multiple-family, and residential professional south of <br />Greenacres, all with either site review designation or under planned unit develop- <br />ment (see planning staff notes and minutes). Mr. Saul continued that staff and <br />Commission took the position that there was overriding public need to determine <br />an appropriate development pattern for these properties in accordance with what <br />occurred on properties in the County to the west - Eugene Sand & Gravel and County <br />shops.' If an appropriate development pattern could not be developed, the General <br />Plan would have to be revised or properties developed on an individual basis. <br /> <br />Trygve Vik, 1675 Firland Boulevard, and Doug Larkins, 1862 Taylor Street, were in <br />favor of the rezoning, saying it feel within the 1990 Plan and definitely should <br />be approved. <br /> <br />Walter Sands, 1121 Balboa, said that most of the residents in the area were not <br />aware this rezoning was being considered. He was not opposed to the commercial <br />rezoning bud did object to the proposed density under planned unit procedures <br />because of the current level of school population in that area and the addi- <br />tion of another low~cost housing development. He said he would like to see action <br />on the proposal postponed until people in the neighborhood could get together and <br />decide on a stand they would like to take as a group. <br /> <br />Bruce Taylor, 507 Ayres Road, was in favor of the proposed zone changes south of <br />Greenacres Road, including the residential/professional zoning. However, he took <br />issue with what was proposed north of Greenacres Road. He disputed the validity <br />of the proposal for high- or medium-density use in that area, saying the Plan <br />called for agricultural use there and that the proposed residential use would not <br />be compatible with adjacent industrial uses. He cited code provisions as they <br />applied to protection of people from incompatible uses creating noise, dirt, etc., <br />and said is seemed obvious this rezoning would be in conflict with the code in <br />that respect. He said the illusion was given that the commercial development <br />north of Greenacres Road waul buffer residential areas, providing adequate sound <br />protection. However, there was no assurance that the commercial and residential <br />developments would occur simultaneously. The DEQ should be asked to comment on <br />the feasibility of sound buffering in this instance, hs aid. Mr. Taylor continued <br />that there was no need.for a change of the kind that would "slap apartments up <br />against industrial." He asked denial of the rezoning proposed on land north of <br />Greenacres Road and proposed instead its use for agricultural purposes as a buffer <br />between the industrial and residential areas. He referred to the twelve findings <br />of fact set out in planning commission minutes and said the first four dealing <br />with desirability of neighborhood commercial were not valid because there already <br />was commercial zoning south of Greenacres Road. Also, the next six findings <br />dealing with protection of existing and proposed residential uses against en- <br />croachment he thought were a violation of regulations. And other findings stating <br />the proposal would provide adequate low-income housing were not valid because of <br />the number of existing high-density developments on Belt Line. <br /> <br />Steve Kenney, 1150 Balboa, asked postponement of action until people in the area <br />had an opportunity to gather and talk about it. He noted his participation in <br />both county and city planning activities in years past and expressed surprise that <br />this proposal had come up without any notice. He said there was a Willakertzie <br />neighborhood association just now forming in the area, and this proposal was the <br />type of thing that group should discuss. <br /> <br />\9 <br /> <br />1/27/75 - 3 <br />