Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Donald Zdroy, 2815 Kincaid Street, didn't agree with the planning proposed for <br />the area where his property is located. The proposed right-of-way dedication, <br />he said, would ruin a good house location. <br /> <br />(1470) <br /> <br />There was no further testimony offered and the public hearing was closed. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />Councilman Murray asked staff what impact the fairly significant annexation near- <br />by would have on building permits in that area and whether some increase in popula- <br />tion was expected there. Assistant Manager answered that extension of sewers to <br />the Skyline Loop annexation would accelerate development in that area. <br /> <br />Councilwoman Shirey asked for clarification.of access to Mr. Zdroy's property. <br />Assistant Manager said that Mr. Zdroy did have access to 43rd Avenue. He would <br />not necessarily have to change that access upon dedication of the right-of-way, <br />but it would provide exit to the south rather than having to go north to 43rd. <br />If no public need was found for the right-of-way in the future, the area could <br />be vacated and ownership would revert to the abutting properties. Mr. Chenkin <br />added that planning staff felt the pattern shown on map of the area was the only <br />feasible and safe way to develop streets in that area because of intersecting <br />streets from the west. <br /> <br />Councilman Bradley asked for clarification of the appeal, whether Mr. Zdroy was <br />appealing on the right-of-way dedication requirement or all three conditions of <br />the subdivision approval. Assistant Manager answered that the main issue was <br />dedication of right-of-way on 43rd and at the south end of Mr. Zdroy's property, <br />there was no objection to dedication of the sewer easement. <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved second by Mr. Keller to deny the appeal and adopt <br />as findings of fact supporting the denial planning staff notes and <br />minutes of February 4, 1975 and memo from planning department dated <br />February 21, 1975. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />Mr. Zdroy couldn't see any possibility of a road's being constructed on the <br />right-of-way required because the property owner to the east of his property <br />was proposing his own entry. Also, the property owner to the south would not <br />permit a sewer easement through his parcel, he (Zdroy) had stated he was more <br />than willing to permit the easement on his south property line. But he felt it <br />too early for the city to take the acreage. He said he would have to change <br />his plans to accommodate the city's plans. <br /> <br />Vote was taken on the motion as stated. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />C. Compacted Garbage Rates <br /> <br />Compacted Garbage Rates - Copies of resDlution setting out rates were distributed <br />to Council members with agenda. Adoption of the resolution was recOmmended by <br />the Garbage Board in order to establish rates for compacted garbage to provide <br />control of the competition situation between collectors. <br /> <br />(1583) <br /> <br />Mr. Murray moved seconded by Mr. Williams to approve <br />rates and present the resolution for adoption at the <br />meeting. Motion carried unanimously. <br /> <br />the proposed <br />March 24 Council. <br /> <br />l~ umm <br />3/19/75 <br />Pub I-irng <br /> <br />Assistant Manager explained that one of the major garbage haulers had not re- <br />ceived notice of the Garbage Board's discussion and had a number of concerns <br />about the proposed rate structure. Staff was unable to reach any members of <br />the Board for an explanation of the rates. <br /> <br />.- <br /> <br />Public hearing was opened. <br /> <br />3/24/75 - 2 <br /> <br />, ?>2. <br />