Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />charter retained. He reviewed the history of the Association and said the <br />basic concern was that careful consideration be given to size of area and <br />interests therein to assure a representative organization working with the <br />entire area. He said a refinement plan was being prepared for the area and <br />an organization is needed to provide a legitimate spokesman and views for <br />discussion and resolution as that plan is being developed. <br /> <br />(0557) <br /> <br />Public hearing was ope;l\ed. <br /> <br />Bob Guldin and Jim Coates, 860 Lawrence Street, said residents of the area had <br />made a real and sincere ef~ort to become involved in the Downtown Westside <br />Associaton but found it \(i.rtually impossible. Mr. Guldin said there had been <br />only one general membe~ship meeting in the ten months since recognition of the <br />group by the Council, ~lld that he felt the Association had not been fulfilling <br />the function of opening itself to citizen participation. Rather it appeared to be <br />involved with only one group of people in that neighborhood, and tenants or resi- <br />dents have not had the opportunity to become involved. He thought that if the <br />Charter were revoked then a general meeting of the entire neighborhood could be <br />called, starting from that point in deciding whether the group should join another <br />existing group or form a new one. Mr. Coates reviewed specific meetings of the <br />Association and desdribed actions taken that appeared to preclude some people from <br />participation, in particular the requirement for attendance of new members at a <br />previous meeting before being eligible to vote. With only one general meeting, <br />he said, many were denied the opportunity to vote. He said also that many volun- <br />teered for work on committees or in publishing the newsletter but none were con- <br />tacted, nor did they receive information about city activities in the neighborhood. <br />He said the Association had been petitioned and every effort made to become active <br />in that organization to no avail. <br /> <br />-- <br /> <br />Margaret Ellis, 2486 Grovedale Street, Springfield, said she owned C-2 property sur- <br />rounded by other commercial uses. She said any reorganization of this group into <br />a residential oriented organization would constitute discrimination against business <br />interests in the area. <br /> <br />(0726) <br /> <br />Chester Pietka, 372 West 12th Avenue, thought the Council should have asked the <br />Association for an answer in response to the petition filed for revocation of its <br />charter. He pointed out that notices and publications of the newsletter had noti- <br />fied people in the neighborhood of the Association's meetings. And that an attempt <br />had been made to include all facets of the neighborhood in development of planning <br />for the area - predominantly commercial with many long-term owner residents - in <br />order to provide an area complimentary to the downtown mall. He questioned the <br />credibility of the group requesting revocation of the Association's charter since <br />there was no opposition presented at the time the charter was before the Council <br />for recognition. He noted the spokesman for the group, Mr. Guldin, had lived in the <br />neighborhood only two months, and that others who had attended the organizational <br />meetings did not live there now. He said the Association had made every effort to <br />work with the people involved in seeking the charter revocation and he thought the <br />city should consider whether the organization had followed the terms of its charter <br />in its meeting and notice requirements. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Minnie Schmidt, 2605 Lawrence Street, noted that some of the people signing the <br />petition for charter revocation lived outside the neighborhood area, and that some <br />were living in commercial buildings without adequate living facilities. She thought <br />proof of residence in the area should be required and that the Council should de- <br />clare the petition illegal. <br /> <br />John S. Smeed, 3655 Glen Oak Drive, owner of property in the Downtown Westwide area, <br />said the group initiating revocation of the Association's charter for the most part <br />had lived in the neighborhood less than a year, and that the long-term residents <br /> <br />20e <br /> <br />4/28/75 - 3 <br />