Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />Frank Bonson, 390 West 23rd Avenue, asked for Council consideration of the plan- <br />ning staff report. He found it difficult to believe that with the very thorough, <br />complete analysis presented by staff the issue could be denied by the vote of <br />only three people - and on a tie vote. He said the applicant had followed all <br />guidelines of the Fasano rules, the General Plan, and had established need for <br />neighborhood commercial use on the site. He noted the unusual layout of the <br />lots resulting in one-half of each being zoned for a different use and asked con- <br />firmation of staff recommendation to rezone the R-l to C-l, or at least to send <br />the issue back to the Planning Commission for further consideration. <br /> <br />John Skillern, 1960 University Street, identified himself as the realtor who <br />had sold this property to LICO Corporation. He said the zoning change was re- <br />quested to effect an orderly development of the property without damage to the <br />community. <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Jon Silvermoon, 47~ West 25th Avenue, representing the Friendly Area Neighbors, <br />said the neighborhood association had the general feeling that the proposed <br />zoning would not conform with the 1990 Plan and was not something the neighbor- <br />hood wanted. He noted the commercial centers available in the south Eugene area, <br />many of which were relatively close to the 19th and Jefferson area. The basic <br />objection to this rezoning, he said, was that uses permitted, in ,~ C-I zone ~nder <br />the zoning ordinance were too broad - it would give blanket approval to some 30 <br />uses on this property. He noted similar commercial uses in other areas of the <br />city were in some cases located on arterial streets. That would not be so at <br />19th and Jefferson; to allow further commercial use there would be to generate <br />more traffic for the basically residential area. He noted the neighborhood organiza- <br />tion was fairly new and had not yet prepared a neighborhood plan. However, he said, <br />the group recognized that a decision against expanding commercial uses in the area <br />would set the precedent for evolving a neighborhood plan. <br /> <br />Kathy Tri, 1979 Jefferson Street, noted that the people in the neighborhood felt <br />there was no need for further commercial development. They were not in favor of <br />any development that would increase traffic more than that now generated by the <br />use of 18th as an arterial and by the Jefferson Street bridge. <br /> <br />,Public hearing was closed, there being no further testimony presented. <br /> <br />I-A-2 <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Councilman Bradley asked how the "mom and pop" type grocery store would fit the <br />1990 Plan definition of neighborhood commercial centers. If there was no tangible <br />criteria in the Plan for that type of service, he said, perhaps a decision on this <br />issue should await either amendment of the Plan or development of some specific <br />definition of neighborhood commercial centers. Mr. Saul noted the material sub- <br />mitted in connection with another zoning issue in the past several weeks with re- <br />gard to neighborhood commercial centers that could be used as a basis for reaching <br />a determination in this instance. He recognized the general nature of the Plan in <br />its reference to neighborhood commercial areas, at the same time pointing out <br />the rather generalized description of what could be located in those centers and <br />citing location of several such centers in the city. He added that staff did not <br />feel its recommendation was inconsistent with provisions of the 1990 Plan since <br />the degree of the requested change was very small in terms of qualitative assess- <br />ment. He said staff would not recommend withholding action because development <br />of definitions on neighborhood centers would have to be studied. <br /> <br />Mr. O'Reilly referred to the neighborhood's objection to uses that could be de- <br />veloped at 19th and Jefferson under C-l zoning and said that Council action had <br />already determined what uses are permitted in C-l zones; and C-l zoning was al- <br />ready on the property. The fact that some uses under C-l zoning would be ob- <br /> <br />qS <br /> <br />2/23/76 - 3 <br />