Laserfiche WebLink
<br />west of the downtown business core. He said land use in that westside area <br />would be considered upon receipt of .a subsequent report from the Commission; <br />the one under discussion relates only to the Commission's recommendation with <br />regard to moving traffic eastward from the Jefferson/Washington couplet and -- <br />re-examining the objectives of the urban renewal plan and expansion of the re- <br />tail and cultural activities in the downtown area. <br />Jim Saul, planner, in presenting background information with regard to the <br />Commission's recommendation, noted previous distribution to Council members of <br />Planning staff notes and minutes covering public hearings before the Commission <br />on the Blayney and Kayser reports with regard to the area between Charnel ton <br />and Jefferson, 7th and 13th. Based on those hearings, the Commission recommended <br />adoption of policy statement that would recognize the desirability of moving <br />arterial traffic eastward from the Washington/Jefferson couplet and commitment <br />to that goal if shown to be feasible upon determination of the (1) effect on the <br />total transportation network, (2) monetary cost, and (3) social cost, including <br />the effeyt upon other neighborhoods. He said the Commission recognized, as did <br />the Blayney report, that any shift of traffic should be done as part of the over- <br />all ESATS update currently in progress, but shifting the movement eastward would <br />enhance both the residential area and retail activities downtown. The adoption <br />of the recommended policy statement, he said, would not specifically make a com- <br />mitment to :he use of Lincoln Street or any other alternative at this time, but <br />it does s<l'ess the importance of evaluating monetary and social costs and effect <br />upon the total transportation system before any shift is made. <br />Mr. Saul continued that the second policy statement involved reaffirmation of <br />the (;"I'f'5 policy with regard to the promotion of a vital downtown core area and <br />objectives of the urban renewal plan and community goals statements, the renewal <br />area to be expanded to include the block containing the WOW hall at 8th and - <br />Lincoln where major restraints were recommended in considering development of <br />that block. <br /> Public hearing was opened. <br />Brenda Krivak, no address given, and Brian Livingston, 1991 Garfield Street, <br />showed slides depicting suggested alternatives for the westside area as presented <br />in a memo previously distributed to Council members. Mr. Livingston said citizens- <br />lay people - should be involved in the planning process before the professional <br />planners had a set plan, that public hearings did not really constitute citizen <br />involvement. He felt citizens should be involved in the transportation system <br />update - ESATS - in the design process before it was completed, not when it was <br />presented in public hearing. He described the Community Design process proposed <br />in their memo. <br />Scott Lieuall en, 1190 West Broadway, thought this was an excellent opportunity <br />to carry out community goals and General Plan statements with regard to routing <br />traffic corridoes around residential neighborhoods rather than through them. He <br />felt the traffic should be moved from Washington/Jefferson and said the neighbor- <br />hood groups, as well as citizens involved in the ESATS update, had support that <br />idea. Where it should be moved to, he said, should be open to further discussion <br />but it should be to an area compatible with that type of traffic. <br />Clark Cox, Jr., 1085 Patterson Street #9, agreed that the present Washington/ <br />Jefferson traffic was out of character with that residential neighborhood. He . <br />also favored further retail expansion of the downtown area rather than putting <br />that activity in a residential area, but he thought it would be impossible to <br />make a concrete decision until the outcome of the ESATS update was known. <br />10/25/76 - 4 <br /> 50~ <br />