Laserfiche WebLink
<br />" <br /> rather than outright uses. This would allow proposed residential <br />e developments to address preservation of the neighborhood character, <br /> ample and usable open space, a variety of residential unit sizes, <br /> attempts to use or preserve existing structures, rehousing displaced <br /> residents, and a provision of units suitable for senior citizens and <br /> special and low-income groups. He reiterated that the NAG favors <br /> the concept of the Mixed-Use District and encouraged City Council <br /> to specify R-4 density as a conditional use. <br /> Neil Murray, 653 West Broadway, representing the Westside Neighbor- <br /> hood Quality Project, said they endorse the mixed-use zoning as <br /> proposed, and felt that zoning would enhance and be a fitting comple- <br /> ment to commercial uses on the east and residential uses on the <br /> west. However, the group had one reservation and felt using R-4 zoning <br /> for some high-density development under conditional use would be <br /> beneficial. The group felt the City is obligated to adopt a policy to <br /> enhance the residential nature of the areas around the downtown. He <br /> also said the group thought the Council's past action in calling <br /> for residential uses of the area was a further commitment. He <br /> urged Council to recognize this mixed-use zoning recommendation as a <br /> compromise proposal. <br /> Gerald A. Wilson, 670 West Broadway, said his property was adjacent <br /> to this area, and felt the future of his property would relate to <br /> the future of the area in the proposed rezoning. He supported the <br /> mixed-use rezoning as it would be much more compatible than commercial <br />e use. <br /> Joan Gray, 1252 West 12th, expressed support for the mixed use as <br /> recommended by the Planning Commission. She owned 2/5 of a block, <br /> which is under consideration for rezoning from C-2 to mixed use. <br /> She is planning to develop the property over the next two to three <br /> years with a combination of residential and commercial use. She <br /> expressed concern over the narrow restrictive commercial uses allowed <br /> outright in existing structures and sanctioned for conditional use <br /> in new construction. She said if the intent of the new rezoning is <br /> to stimulate development of higher-density residential, then the <br /> ordinance should provide a variety of commercial uses for the <br /> residents in the area. She urged Council to amend Item No. 3 of the <br /> Use Section to include commercial uses such as coffee shops, cafes, <br /> bakeries, banks, delicatessens, variety stores, and meat markets. She <br /> felt these uses would supply needed social centers and add to the life <br /> in the area. She said it takes more than housing to attract people to <br /> an area and make them want to stay, citing these additional commercial <br /> uses would provide more amenities to the people. With the suggested <br /> addition, she went on record as being in general support of new <br /> commercial development which is aimed primarily at providing services <br /> for the residents of the neighborhood. <br />e <br /> 9/26/77--3 <br /> (~, <br />