Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> e He reviewed some general recommendations: The suggestion that the <br /> general purpose government should maintain as great a control as <br /> possible over the policy instruments. Also, from what is known of <br /> the tools available, none is likely to have any positive impact on <br /> the rate of growth of job opportunities locally. He said there was <br /> little, if anything, that could be done locally to increase jOb <br /> opportunities over present conditions. He said employment growth <br /> could be. slowed down by increasing the inefficiency of local policies. <br /> That concluded the thrust of the October 10 memo. <br /> In reviewing the November 5 memo from the Planning Department, Mr. <br /> Whitelaw continued it was a summary of what has been going on with <br /> discussions and projects in economic development. He di rected <br /> Counci1's attention to the recommendations listed on page 3, noting <br /> they were consistent with the October 10 memo. <br /> 1 . Institutional Arrangements: The Council should endorse the <br /> concept of a Lane County economic improvement commission with <br /> the stipulation that its bylaws provide for 40 percent of the <br /> commission's voting members to be appointed by the Eugene City <br /> Council and provide a mechanism which allows the City Council <br /> to validate actions which directly affect the City of Eugene. <br /> He noted this was also consistent with the memo as proposed by <br /> the L-COG Board. The next recommendation was the Council should <br /> not endorse the concept of a Lane County Port Authority. He said <br /> the major purpose of a Port District was to increase job opportuni- <br /> e ties, and the evidence suggested Eugene had little or no chance <br /> to increase that. He continued even if a Port District did have <br /> some influence, it would be very desirable to keep the coordinating <br /> component of economic pOlicy within the local government. He noted <br /> a Port District is in effect an autonomous taxing and spending <br /> local government. <br /> Comprehensive Employment and Training Act--He recalled for Council <br /> the major unemployment groups in the area. He said to minimize the <br /> burdens of the unemployed, Eugene should coordinate with Lane County <br /> the unemployment placement programs so as to reduce the length of <br /> job search, and also should increase employment training to allow a <br /> more competitive posture by locally unemployed in their search for jobs. <br /> Mr. Delay questioned Mr. Whitelaw as to the rationale that ended up with <br /> the 40 percent representation figure. He felt it necessary for juris- <br /> dictions in Lane County to have some kind of review and veto power, but <br /> wondered if there might not be some fear from others of dominance. He <br /> wondered how necessary it was to get an exact proportional representation. <br /> Jim Farah, Planner, said all the work Mr. Whitelaw had done had pointed <br /> out the preeminance of the City of Eugene in the context of an economic <br /> center. He noted it had to do with the ability t9 affect City policies <br /> in this context. More directly, he answered, the 40-percent figure <br /> had come from the 1976 population ratio of Eugene to Lane County. <br /> e <br /> 8J.f1f 11 /16/77 --3 <br />