12/21/1977 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0 the Women's Commission. Mr. Haws explained that all commissioners e who reapplied, as well as current alternates, are being recommended for appointment. For any additional vacancies, interviews were conducted from those who applied. Mr. Haws moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, to accept recommendations for the Youth, Minority, Handicapped, and Aging Commissions, as well as the two agreed upon recommendations for the Women's Commission. Motion carried unanimously. Mr. Obie suggested that the entire Council interview the two candi- dates on which there was a difference of opinion for the Women's \ Commission. The two candidates are Linda Wilson and Doris Storms. Mr. Obie moved, seconded by Mr. Hamel, that the Linda Wilson and Doris Storms be interviewed by the entire Council at the time of the Planning Commission interviews. Mr. Haws said he didn't wish to interview the two people again. Ms. Smith said she would like to hear from Women's Commission president Sarah Lichtenstein. Mr. Bradley felt that, if Ms. Lichtenstein commented at this time, her remarks might be directed toward a certain applicant, which would be inappropriate. Vote was taken on the motion which carried, all Council members present voting aye except Mr. Haws and Mr. Lieuallen voting e no. Mr. Haws felt that in the future more action should be taken to make sure that qualified candidates apply. G. Joint County Commissioners-Council Meeting--February 7 at 6:00 p.m. is the tentative date set for a joint dinner meeting between the City Council and the County Commissioners with. Springfield. Agenda items will be distributed later. II. ANNEXATION REPORT AND DISCUSSION--A report was distributed December 9, 1977, and the LCDC staff-proposed draft rule was distributed with the agenda. Mr. Saul, Planner, explained that the report had a three-fold purpose: To apprise the Planning Commission and City Council what was not hap- pening regarding annexation proposals submitted already to Eugene; apprise the Planning Commission and City Council of some of the major questions and issues involved regarding review of annexations under recent changes in state legislation, particularly in Senate Bill 570 and the Peterson vs. Klamath Falls Supreme Court decision; apprise the Planning Commission and City Council of the draft rule prepared by LCDC dealing with the question of annexations and, more particularly, e .q3l 12/21/77--2