Laserfiche WebLink
<br />West Butte, and East Butte. Regarding the Blair subsection, he noted <br />east of Blair on about 3rd, the neighborhood would be rezoned fro~ <br />industrial back to residential, representing the existing use in the <br />area. The same would be true for the Sladden area, rezoning from <br />industrial to residential to conform to present use. The West Butte <br />neighborhood includes a deteriorated residential area which has been <br />designated for medium- and high-density residential use, as well as <br />some mixed-use, light industrial, and commercial designations. The <br />East Butte area contains substantial open space and recreational <br />resources, and was the major area of disagreement over appropriate <br />land-use designation. This area is considered to be a very attrac- <br />tive area and would lend itself to livability close to the downtown <br />area. The present zoning in the area is R-3, which would limit the <br />density to 30 units per acre. The Planning Commission had attached <br />site review procedures to accommodate a conflict regarding the histor- <br />ical importance of the area. <br /> <br />He noted the T-2000 Plan was still under consideration by the City, <br />with one facet being the possible Roosevelt Freeway which would bisect <br />the Sladden neighborhood more. He.said one of the policies in the <br />refinement plan was that any major arterial would be located on tbe <br />periphery of the area. Regarding implementation of the plan, the <br />list of priorities were set forth. He said this implementation would <br />involve a lengthy time frame, noting the various rezoning issues <br />involved. In summary, the Planning Commission feels the Whiteaker <br />Refinement Plan Draft, as recommended, represents a major step for- <br />ward in addressing the complex issues of the Whiteaker community. <br /> <br />Mr. Obie wondered, regarding the major arterial being placed on <br />the periphery, whether or not this was a political or planning <br />decision. Dr. MacKinnon was not aware of how those decisions were <br />reached, but noted if the plan were approved it would close the <br />option for the Roosevelt Freeway, unless the plan were revised. <br /> <br />Pat Decker, Planning Department, reviewed three areas: 1) Citi- <br />zen participation; 2) organization of the plan; and 3) follow-up. <br />Regarding citizen participation, she noted the concept of the plan <br />began January 1976, with a planning team from each of the four <br />neighborhoods and business community represented. Interviews were <br />conducted with a resulting slide show produced which was presented at <br />11 various meetings throughout May and June 1976. Community response <br />was then requested to identify issues of concern. Mass mailings <br />were also used for issue identification. She noted the ongoing role <br />of the planning ,team in participating and developing the goals and <br />policies in the plan, with Planning staff providing liaison. The <br />plan review process consisted of a copy of the plan, in 1977, being <br />sent to all residents, business people, and nonresident property <br />owners. There were a series of meetings held which culminated in <br />a meeting November 9, at which time a recommendation was made to <br />the Planning Commission on the refinement plan. Subsequently, the <br /> <br />5/8/78--2 <br /> <br />~~ <br /> <br />> , <br /> <br />, , <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br /> <br />- <br />