Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> ~ - <br /> Those speaking against the appeal were as follows: Peter Thompson, <br /> 2440 Oak Grove Drive, spoke on behalf of the applicant as the Design <br /> -- Team Coordinator. He noted this was a preliminary approval, and <br /> his applicant was in agreement with the Hearings Officia1's recommen- <br /> dations regarding the problems and how they should be addressed. He <br /> said his team had worked with City staff to ensure this would <br /> be a safe development. The water problems on the site had been <br /> reviewed. It was felt this project could be built and the design <br /> team had the expertise to do so. <br /> Jack Tompkins, 4630 Larkwood Street, was the engineering geologist <br /> for the design team of the PUD. Regarding soil movement and Mr. <br /> Knapp.s comments of the six conditions from the South Hills Study, he <br /> noted that study does identify a number of general conditions, any <br /> one of which could increase the potential for large soil movement. <br /> He said there was soil depth to 40 inches, with a general 20-percent <br /> slope which may cause the soil movement. However, he felt a number <br /> of the existing and natural man-made slopes would be stable. He felt <br /> if any of the hillside were going to have given way, it would have <br /> done so by now. Regarding the bedrock classification, the discrep- <br /> ancy was a nomenclature. He and Mr. Williamson both agreed the <br /> bearing strength would equate to 10,000 pounds per square foot, which <br /> was considerably higher than 1,000 required by the architect. This <br /> was felt to be more than adequate for development. Regarding Mr. <br /> Knapp's demonstration of the crumbling of shale, he said that would <br /> occur when the material was taken out of its natural state. However, <br /> he noted that had nothing to do with the inherent strength of the <br /> material in place on the site in its natural surrounding. In the <br /> -- testing he had done, he said there were no indications of instability, <br /> and no indications of deleterious material beneath the existing fill. <br /> Regarding the dewatering, the plan is to take out only the excess <br /> water. Regarding runoff, an underground storm system will be designed <br /> to carry off the excess drainage. In preparing the footing, he said <br /> it was planned to excavate through the clay and fill with crushed <br /> rock, which would allow greater strength. He noted in Eugene, the <br /> moisture content in depths of three to four feet were pretty constant <br /> throughout the year. He concluded by saying this is a buildable site <br /> and the expertise was available to make it safe. <br /> Tom Poage, 4325 Catalina, Project Engineer, said storm sewers would <br /> be located immediately downstream from the site. He felt the drainage <br /> issue could be answered by the teChnOlogical equations and knowledge <br /> of the hill. The effect of Treehouse PUD is small in terms of <br /> studying the entire basin that affects the Amazon Channel. The <br /> present design of storm sewers for runoff is 47.6 cfs; with Treehouse <br /> added, it would be increased to 53.2 cfs. He said adequate drainage <br /> would have to be provided for only one-half inch of higher water. <br /> Storm sewers have been designed for the entire development and can be <br /> provided to each and every house. He said if the PUD were developed, <br /> there would be about 1/40th of the foot change in elevation of the <br /> Amazon Drainage System. <br /> e <br /> 6/12/78--3 <br /> '12., <br /> - <br />