Laserfiche WebLink
<br />, <br />, <br /> . M I NUT E S <br />-- EUGENE CITY COUNCIL <br /> June 26, 1978 <br /> Adjourned meeting from June 21, 1978, of the City Council of the City of Eugene, <br /> Oregon, was called to order by His Honor Mayor Gus Keller at 7:30 p.m., June 26, <br /> 1978, in the Council Chamber with the fOllowing Councilors present: D. W. <br /> Hamel, Ray Bradley, Tom Williams, Eric Haws, Jack Delay, Scott Lieuallen, Brian <br /> Obie, and Betty Smith. <br /> I. Public Hearings <br /> A. Consideration of Fire Code Revisions <br /> Manager said the proposal was for adoption of the 1976 Uniform Fire <br /> Code (UFC) with amendments. Council had already adopted the 1973 <br /> version and this action would update the provisions of the UFC. A <br /> second issue involved is the adoption of the amendments to the Code <br /> which relax the sprinkler ordinance passed by the Council June 23, <br /> 1975. The amendments would require smoke detectors installed in all <br />e private dwellings upon the sale of the dwelling, and would require <br /> installation of smoke detectors in all units of multi-residential <br /> dwellings. The resulting adoption of the Code with the amendments <br /> will be a code more stringent than the minimum code proposed by the <br /> UFC. Fire Marshal Wendell Wick, Battalion Chief David Boggs, and Mick <br /> Nolte, Superintendent of Building Inspection, were available to answer <br /> questions. <br /> Assistant Manager said Council should place its focus on the following <br /> issues: 1) updating of the existing code, which would bring the city <br /> ordinance into compliance with State building and other uniform <br /> building codes; 2) whether or not there should be a relaxation of the <br /> present law as applied to existing structures, i.e., whether or not <br /> the current requirement for sprinklers should be relaxed to allow <br /> highrise residential structures to have life safety sprinklers along <br /> with smoke detectors; 3) the installation of smoke detection devices <br /> in residential occupancies in the community; and 4) whether or not <br /> sprinklers should be required in new structures. He noted all were <br /> extensions of a policy decision made for implementation of the master <br /> satellite program for early warning and containment of fires. <br /> The proposed amendments are an attempt to deal with the question of <br /> costs of fire defenses and what can be, or should be, the level of <br /> fire suppression for the community. The intent of the master satel- <br /> lite system was to provide more rapid response with less manpower. In <br /> dealing with highrise structures, the fire responses are different in <br />- that ladders are needed, and more manpower is needed to evacuate <br /> 6/26/78--1 <br /> 455 <br />