08/14/1978 Meeting - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

----~ Glenn Mason, 1980 West 24th, commented that historic landmarks used to e be buildings that were famous because of people who had stayed there, 1 i ved there, or had otherwi se been associ ated wi th the buil di ngs. He feels that notion is now dying down. He said the Historic Review Board feels the buildings have broad cultural historic impact. He then presented slides showing some of the history of Eugene, the types of buildings that were here in the first place, and the subsequent impact that having these buildings designated as historic landmarks would have on the city's heritage. He said the three buildings in question are commercial buildings and of a very simple use, but that is what made Eugene what it is today. Charles Kupper, HCC Director, commented that both the Historic Review Board and the Renewal Agency have struggled intensively with the issue. He felt that, while Mr. Mason's presentation was a good one, it indicates that what constitutes history might be a highly subjective standard. He reviewed the notes given to Council earlier in that the ERA's position is that it disputes the historic relevance of the buildings. He also said that, if the Renewal Agency is limited to restoration, the potential tax return will be much less. He said the tax return on new construction would be about $50,000 annually whereas for rehabilitation it would only be about $20,000. Mr. Hamel questioned how those buildings fit into the plan for downtown development. Mr. Kupper responded he did not believe the three build- ings were included as possible to be rehabilitated. e Frank Shearer, 2425 Wilson Drive, representing the Eugene Renewal Agency, said he feels some people view the ERA's actions as bulldozer kinds of attitudes. He said in fact the Board did much soul-searching on thi smatter. He said that the ERA operates under a plan adopted much earlier and he doubts if, at this stage, the board can change the plan by leaving buildings that were marked for demolition. Council members declared ex parte contacts and conflicts of interest. Mayor Keller said he received calls on both sides of the issue but that he did not think it would affect his decision. Mrs. Smith said she received one phone call which was not a conflict. Mr. Hamel said he had two phone calls and he responded that he could not talk about the matter. Mr. Obie said he had calls on both sides which he didn't think would affect his decision. Mr. Bradley said he received phone calls and indicated he could not listen to the content of the calls. Staff notes and minutes were entered as part of the record. Public hearing was opened. Dan Childress, 1845-1/2 University, commented that buildings of this size were most appropriate to the area. He said the downtown area needs to keep solar exposure coming to the park blocks so it is desirable to keep the size of the buildings down. e 8/14/78--2 553