Laserfiche WebLink
<br />e <br /> <br />D. Agenda Changes <br />1. East Butte Historic Landmark Area will be Item III. <br /> <br />2. Item VI: Civic Center Project should be labeled Civic Center <br />Project Debt Service Payment. <br /> <br />E. Council Support of HB 2424 and SB 629--Manager said a request had <br />been received at Monday's Council meeting by persons opposing the <br />Council IS support of the two bills regarding sexual orientation now <br />at the State Legislature. At that time, Mayor Keller indicated he <br />would allow a statement to be made at this Wednesday's meeting. Mayor <br />Keller indicated requests both for and against Council IS action, and <br />allotted each side five minutes. <br /> <br />Those speaking in favor of the Council IS action supporting the bills <br />were as follows: <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />Constance Newman, 894 West 4th, who said homosexuals are found in <br />all classes and jobs. She said they are working people, but have <br />suffered discrimination from employers because they are homosexual. <br />She said by Council IS support of the bills, it is backing democratic <br />rights and urged the Council to continue its support. <br /> <br />Rosemary Batori, 2030 East 19th, spoke on behalf of the Women's <br />Commission. She questioned why the Council was again discussing this <br />issue, as she felt it had been decided at the April 4 Council meeting. <br /> <br />Dominick Vetri, representing Eugene Citizens For Human Rights, thanked <br />Council for its support of the bills. He reviewed the progress <br />that was being made by homosexuals although discrimination still <br />exists for them. He said Ballot Measure 51 results indicated only 34 <br />percent of the registered voters expressed their disfavor of the <br />ordinance passed by the Council. He felt the public was beginning to <br />realize that arbitrary discrimination hurts everyone. He reviewed a <br />poll which indicated many companies in the country have adopted a <br />non-discrimination policy toward homosexuals. Many cities and states <br />are taking similar actions. Also, he said laws were being changed <br />within the Internal Revenue Service, Federal civil service, and <br />military to reduce discrimination for homosexuals. He felt civil <br />liberties have generally never fared well at the polls, and hoped the <br />Legislature would give civil rights to homosexuals. <br /> <br />Those speaking against Council IS action were as follows: <br /> <br />Mike Hilty, 1905 West 34th, spoke on behalf of VOICE, and Maureen <br />Gieber. He said of the total 61 precincts, only one had favored the <br />homosexual ordinance in the May 1978 election. He asked the Council <br />retract its support of the bills because the voters had stated their <br />opposition. He felt it unethical and irresponsible that Council <br />would support the bills in direct contradiction to what the voters <br /> <br />e <br /> <br />4/11/79--3 <br /> <br />LiLt <br />