Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> - .--- <br /> l' <br /> . <br /> M I NUT E S <br /> . EUGENE CITY COUNCIL <br /> July 9, 1979 <br /> Regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Eugene, Oregon, was <br /> called to order by His Honor Mayor Gus Keller at 7:30 p.m., Council Cham- <br /> bers, July 9, 1979, with the following Councilors present: Jack Delay, <br /> Betty Smith, D. W. Hamel, Scott Lieuallen, Brian Obie, Gretchen Miller, Emily <br /> Schue. Eric Haws was absent. <br /> I . PUBLI C HEAR I NGS <br /> A. Concurrent AnnexationjRezonings Willakenzie Islands--II (Areas 2, 3, <br /> and 4) (AZ 79-3) (Maps and other materials distributed)--Recommended <br /> by the Planning Commission on May 21, 1979, by a vote of 4:0. <br /> 1. Property located on both sides of Goodpasture Island Road <br /> extending from approximately the south side of K-Mart south to <br /> about the intersection of Valley River Drive and Goodpasture <br /> e Island Road, from County AGT to City R-2PD; County AGT, C-3, <br /> C-2 to City C-2; County AGT to City RA; County RA to City R-1 <br /> Manager noted that all the Willakenzie group annexations were <br /> being undertaken at request of the City Council. The Areas 2, 3, <br /> and 4 Phase 2 were the subject of several hearings before the <br /> Planning Commission, and the Commission, in all three cases, voted <br /> 4:0 to recommend annexation. <br /> Mr. Saul said this was the second in a series of annexations <br /> involving various island areas in Willakenzie. The previous <br /> series of annexations were approved by the Boundary Commission <br /> in April. On April 10 and 24, the Planning Commission conducted <br /> hearings on the three areas. The Planning Commission allowed <br /> additional written testimony until May 4, which was submitted to <br /> Council members. A supplemental report was prepared by the <br /> Planning Department to address the principal issues raised during <br /> that testimony. Part of that testimony was in favor of annexation <br /> and part was opposed. The opposition stemmed from the absence of <br /> sewers in the area, some giving testimony said that the area <br /> should not be annexed until the sewers were installed. Others <br /> wanted the City to guarantee a firm construction date when sewers <br /> would be installed. (Supplemental Report page 2-4) Mr. Saul said <br /> that the City is prohibited by Code from guaranteeing service or <br /> extending service outside the corporate limits of the city. The <br /> . City has contemplated extending service to the area, however, and <br /> 35'1 7/9/79--1 <br />