Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> Mr. Stan Long, City Attorney, informed the Council of the happenings in . <br /> Salem regarding the field burning issue. First, as to the enforcement of <br /> the present federal limitation of 50,000, the Attorney General's office . <br /> assured the Court that they had no intention of violating the law in the <br /> future and would comply with the law until it was changed. The judge <br /> lifted the writ and advised them and the City of Eugene that if burning <br /> exceeded 50,000 without a change in the law, he would reissue the writ <br /> preemptorily. Mr. Long said this was the first time anyone has formally <br /> given their assurance that they will indeed comply with the law until the <br /> law is changed. <br /> The second development was in regard to the State's request to change <br /> the federal limitation by changing the State's Implementation Plan. <br /> The State applied this year for an increase to 180,000 acres with <br /> burning conditions and techniques that were not satisfactory to the <br /> City of Eugene. Mr. Long said they have received word from the <br /> Environmental Protection Agency that the State's request would be <br /> denied. The EPA also advised they were going to implement their own <br /> plan and would give notice of intention to approve 180,000 acres <br /> provided certain technical. justifications could be made. This matter <br /> will come back to the State for additional hearings on burning tech- <br /> niques and justifications. If these techniques are made part of the <br /> SIP, it would go through the process of approval and be publication <br /> in the Federal Registry and would ultimately become federal law, <br /> assuming all the conditions are met. Final approval of a change, <br /> if justified, would come in December. <br /> Councilor Smith asked Mr. Long what might be happening in terms of e <br /> meetings or rulings. Mr. Long responded that the EQC would be having <br /> a meeting soon, and there were several minor points the City has <br /> questions about. The big item is the 250,000 acre limitation <br /> authorized by the legislature, which will set off the whole revision <br /> process again next year. He believes the more responsible course <br /> for the City to follow 1s to develop a level which represents a <br /> reasonable compromise and stay with that. <br /> Councilor Delay asked Mr. Long if he expected that this new review <br /> process would give the City adequate room to ensure that some important <br /> items, like improved acreage release systems and some of the incentives <br /> are included in any such burn program. Mr. Long said he hoped that <br /> was what was involved. <br /> III. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> A. Concurrent Annexation/Rezoning <br /> 1- Property located south of Ayers and west of Gilham from <br /> County AGT,RA to City R-1/PD (Marvin Knutson)(AZ 79-2) <br /> (Map and information distributed) <br /> Unanimously recommended by Planning Commission on June 5, 1979. <br /> I <br /> 7/23/79--2 e <br /> 3't 'l. <br />